Espreso. Global
OPINION

Ukraine in NATO now: risks and scenarios

14 November, 2023 Tuesday
20:51

Former NATO chief proposes Ukraine's accession without Russian-occupied territories

client/title.list_title

Rasmussen, who served as NATO Secretary General from 2009 to 2014, insisted that Ukraine's partial membership plan would not symbolize a freeze on the conflict, but instead, a determination to warn Russia that it cannot prevent Ukraine from joining the Western defense alliance.

***

Is this a good proposal or not?

Let's start with the fact that the proposal is not official and not from an official.

But it is not accidental at all and has one of its goals - to test the reaction of the Alliance members, Russia and, of course, the Ukrainian people.

Whether the proposal is good or not should be judged on the basis of its consequences.

But let's first assess the prospects for continuing the liberation campaign in the format where we are:

  • we are not in NATO;
  • the frontline is almost at parity, which cannot be changed without additional resources;
  • Ukraine is critically dependent on Western financial assistance (US, EU, IMF). The budget deficit for 2024 is over 40%;
  • Ukraine is critically dependent on Western military aid;
  • Ukraine is exclusively in a tactical framework (no strategy and no plan for the future).

The development of events in Ukraine in the current way depends almost entirely on the West (!!!).

Assuming that there will be no military and financial assistance tomorrow, events will develop according to the worst-case scenario...

***

Can a country with territorial disputes become a NATO member?

The NATO Charter does not explicitly prohibit a country with territorial disputes from joining the Alliance.

However, Article 10 of the Charter states that any country wishing to become a member of NATO must be able to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area and be prepared to accept the obligations of the Charter.

In NATO's history, there have been cases when countries with territorial disputes joined the alliance.

For example, Turkey has been a member of NATO since 1952, despite a territorial dispute with Greece over Cyprus.

In 2023, Finland joined NATO, which has a territorial dispute with Russia over Karelia.

So there are theoretical opportunities for Ukraine.

***

How long will it take for Ukraine to join NATO?

The procedure can take from several months to several years.

For example, in 2023, Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO in May and were accepted in July of the same year.

The speed of a new country's accession process depends on several factors, including

  • the readiness of the candidate country to join NATO;
  • the existence of territorial disputes in the candidate country;
  • the attitude of other NATO members to the candidate country's accession.

A new country does not need 100% agreement of all NATO members to join NATO.

According to Article 10 of the NATO Charter, the decision to admit a new country is taken by a 2/3 majority of all Allies.

This means that 26 out of 30 Allies need to vote in favour of a new country's accession to NATO.

And this is where the fun begins.

The countries will have to decide whether they are ready to fight on Ukraine's side in case of violation of its borders.

The weak points of the vote will be: Hungary, Romania, Turkey, possibly Germany, Montenegro.

***

Now let's go through the scenarios and consequences.

There can be a lot of scenarios, but let's take 4 main ones that are at the intersection of 2 stretches:

1. "Ukraine is in NATO" - "Ukraine is not in NATO".

2. "Ukraine is a subject" or "Ukraine is not a subject".

By "subject" we mean the ability of Ukraine to determine its own game (to have a strategy and partnership with the global player the United States)

***

Scenario 1: 'Victim'

"Ukraine is not in NATO" and "Ukraine is not a subject".

The probability is over 50%.

In fact, this is the scenario we have today.

We are critically dependent on military and financial assistance.

The future of Ukraine depends solely on the interests of the United States to maintain global hegemony and the interests of Europe to keep the Horde barbarians(Russians - ed.)away from them.

In this scenario, Ukraine's resources are maximally depleted. Financial and human. And with all the heroism of Ukrainians, we will not be able to liberate our lands on our own.

This scenario is complicated by the fatigue of our donors, our military and civilians from the war.

And the outcome of this scenario does not depend on us.

***

Scenario 2: 'Player'

This is a scenario at the intersection of fields: "Ukraine is a subject" and "Ukraine is not in NATO".

The probability is up to 10%.

Ukraine can be a subject and a "player" only within the framework of the US global interests, as one of the important figures on the global "chessboard".

But for this to happen, Ukraine needs to learn to clearly articulate its strategic goals and become a predictable, contractually capable partner of the United States (which Americans have great doubts about today).

***

Scenario 3: 'Watchtower'

"Ukraine is a NATO member", but "Ukraine is not a subject".

The probability is 30%.

Remember. Countries that do not have their own future strategy are a resource for countries that do!

The collective West is interested in having from us:

  • a controlled buffer zone with Russia;
  • to have a break to prepare for a big war (to replenish the stock of weapons and ammunition);
  • not to risk the lives of their soldiers by outsourcing it.

In this scenario, the West expects Russia to stop trying to continue its terrorist activities.

The occupied territories will not be recognised, but will "hang" indefinitely.

Ukraine will be kept afloat , but there will be no talk of investments.

Ukraine's task in this scenario is to be a "guardian of Europe" - a "physically developed guy who performs his functions for a minimum fee".

The main advantage for Ukraine in this scenario would be

  • respite to accumulate forces and resources;
  • stopping the deaths;
  • protection of the sky and resumption of air traffic with the world;
  • gradual economic recovery within the controlled territories.

***

Scenario 4: 'Europe's security centre'

The intersection of "Ukraine in NATO" and "Ukraine as an entity".

The probability is 20%.

This is probably the most desirable scenario, which:

  • makes Ukraine an important partner of both the EU and the US in the region (essentially, the role of South Korea in Southeast Asia);
  • gives Ukraine not only a respite but also a huge inflow of resources to restore its economy and build a strong defence industry ecosystem based on the Israeli model;
  • gives Ukraine not only an inflow of aid for reconstruction, but also significant investments (the subjective position determines that we clearly understand our priorities, create incentives for their implementation and, as a result, we become very interesting for investors).

As a result, we receive NATO protection, an influx of investments, technologies, and rapid economic growth.

Time is working in our favour in this scenario, as the negative developments in the economies of China and Russia will become more pronounced, creating opportunities for us.

In this scenario, the future of Donbas and Crimea is the future of East Germany, which has finally reunited with West Germany.

***

What are the conclusions?

We all need to adequately assess the strengths and resources that each scenario offers to achieve our long-term goals:

  • security guarantees;
  • restoration of the country's territorial integrity;
  • a strong economy that provides a high quality of life.

And act according to this logic.

For this reason, I would bet on scenario 4, the probability of which is much less than 20% today.

Source

About the author. Anatoliy Amelin, co-founder and director of economic programs at the Ukrainian Institute for the Future

The editors do not always share the views expressed by the authors of the blogs. 


 
Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
22 January
21:15
If borders were opened, 70% of Ukrainians would not move abroad, survey shows
21:00
Trump calls on Russia to make deal to end Ukraine war, warns of sanctions and tariffs
20:39
Exclusive
U.S. Presidential change – opportunity for Ukraine that must be seized, says MP Syniutka
20:18
Exclusive
Military expert explains why Russian forces succeed in encircling settlements
19:56
From defense to offense: key steps Ukraine must take to win war
19:37
From 5,700 to 1,110: Decline of Ukraine’s tank force from 1993 to 2013
19:15
Interview
Ukraine has every chance to become success story for EU if it pursues reforms, unlocks its potential — EU Commissioner Andrius Kubilius for Espreso
18:55
Ukrainian forces repel 41 Russian attacks in Pokrovsk sector
18:35
Russia shells Donetsk region 3,829 times over past day, causing multiple casualties
18:17
OPINION
Trump is back. His goal is 'golden age' for the USA, but where does Ukraine fit in it?
17:55
North Korea might send reinforcements to Kursk region, U.S. says
17:37
Russian army attacks Kostiantynivka with bombs, killing and injuring locals
17:16
OPINION
Kremlin's plan: war lasting lifetime of those who started it
16:55
EU Defense Commissioner Kubilius urges NATO to move military goals 14 years ahead due Russian threat
16:31
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 8-15
Russian forces may enter Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region as they advance toward Pokrovsk
16:10
Finnish 2S1 Gvozdika, also known as PSH 74, illustrative photo from open sources
Denmark supplies Ukraine with 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled howitzer
15:49
'Reason behind North Korean troops' involvement': NATO Commander Cavoli assesses Russia's breakthrough potential
15:32
Syria terminates investment deal with Russia over Tartus port control
15:14
OPINION
Donald Trump's promise of strong U.S. leadership must begin with Ukraine
14:55
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 15-22
January 15-22 live war map: Russian forces launch assault on last stronghold in southern Donetsk region
14:43
Trump assigns envoy Kellogg to end war in Ukraine in 100 days — media
14:25
Exclusive
'Prepare for turbulence with mixed proposals': military expert Zgurets on Trump’s war settlement plan
14:06
Exclusive
Russia suffers heavy losses but fails to gain ground in Kupyansk sector — Achilles Battalion
13:50
Exclusive
Around 220 civilians refuse to evacuate Chasiv Yar despite ongoing fighting
13:32
OPINION
Trump's first statements and orders: what they reveal
13:14
Ukraine authorizes Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle system for military use
12:57
Exclusive
Trump's 'hawks' must not repeat Obama's mistake — Ukrainian diplomat
12:38
Ukraine documents over 7,000 Russian environmental crimes amid ongoing war
12:21
OPINION
Trump: Putin is destroying Russia. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
12:00
Russia violates political prisoners' health rights in Crimea at least 64 times in 2024 — analysts
11:42
Ukrainian forces eliminate 21 North Korean fighters, wound 40 in Russia's Kursk region
11:23
121 combat clashes occur on Russian-Ukrainian front on Jan. 21 — General Staff
11:05
Ukraine will need at least 200,000 peacekeepers to ensure security after ceasefire - Zelenskyy
10:46
Exclusive
Trump has no reason to concede or compromise with Russia — international expert
10:28
Trump administration seeks lasting end to war in Ukraine — U.S. official
10:11
Exclusive
Putin appears to be 'CIA's best agent' — Ukrainian diplomat
09:52
Russia launches drone attack on Ukraine, causing casualties in Mykolaiv
09:34
Russia loses 1,950 soldiers, 60 artillery systems, 11 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
21 January
21:30
Exclusive
Defense Express expert analyzes Russian military production rates amid war
21:10
4,000 North Korean soldiers killed in Kursk region — Zelenskyy
More news