Espreso. Global
OPINION

Ukraine in NATO now: risks and scenarios

14 November, 2023 Tuesday
20:51

Former NATO chief proposes Ukraine's accession without Russian-occupied territories

client/title.list_title

Rasmussen, who served as NATO Secretary General from 2009 to 2014, insisted that Ukraine's partial membership plan would not symbolize a freeze on the conflict, but instead, a determination to warn Russia that it cannot prevent Ukraine from joining the Western defense alliance.

***

Is this a good proposal or not?

Let's start with the fact that the proposal is not official and not from an official.

But it is not accidental at all and has one of its goals - to test the reaction of the Alliance members, Russia and, of course, the Ukrainian people.

Whether the proposal is good or not should be judged on the basis of its consequences.

But let's first assess the prospects for continuing the liberation campaign in the format where we are:

  • we are not in NATO;
  • the frontline is almost at parity, which cannot be changed without additional resources;
  • Ukraine is critically dependent on Western financial assistance (US, EU, IMF). The budget deficit for 2024 is over 40%;
  • Ukraine is critically dependent on Western military aid;
  • Ukraine is exclusively in a tactical framework (no strategy and no plan for the future).

The development of events in Ukraine in the current way depends almost entirely on the West (!!!).

Assuming that there will be no military and financial assistance tomorrow, events will develop according to the worst-case scenario...

***

Can a country with territorial disputes become a NATO member?

The NATO Charter does not explicitly prohibit a country with territorial disputes from joining the Alliance.

However, Article 10 of the Charter states that any country wishing to become a member of NATO must be able to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area and be prepared to accept the obligations of the Charter.

In NATO's history, there have been cases when countries with territorial disputes joined the alliance.

For example, Turkey has been a member of NATO since 1952, despite a territorial dispute with Greece over Cyprus.

In 2023, Finland joined NATO, which has a territorial dispute with Russia over Karelia.

So there are theoretical opportunities for Ukraine.

***

How long will it take for Ukraine to join NATO?

The procedure can take from several months to several years.

For example, in 2023, Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO in May and were accepted in July of the same year.

The speed of a new country's accession process depends on several factors, including

  • the readiness of the candidate country to join NATO;
  • the existence of territorial disputes in the candidate country;
  • the attitude of other NATO members to the candidate country's accession.

A new country does not need 100% agreement of all NATO members to join NATO.

According to Article 10 of the NATO Charter, the decision to admit a new country is taken by a 2/3 majority of all Allies.

This means that 26 out of 30 Allies need to vote in favour of a new country's accession to NATO.

And this is where the fun begins.

The countries will have to decide whether they are ready to fight on Ukraine's side in case of violation of its borders.

The weak points of the vote will be: Hungary, Romania, Turkey, possibly Germany, Montenegro.

***

Now let's go through the scenarios and consequences.

There can be a lot of scenarios, but let's take 4 main ones that are at the intersection of 2 stretches:

1. "Ukraine is in NATO" - "Ukraine is not in NATO".

2. "Ukraine is a subject" or "Ukraine is not a subject".

By "subject" we mean the ability of Ukraine to determine its own game (to have a strategy and partnership with the global player the United States)

***

Scenario 1: 'Victim'

"Ukraine is not in NATO" and "Ukraine is not a subject".

The probability is over 50%.

In fact, this is the scenario we have today.

We are critically dependent on military and financial assistance.

The future of Ukraine depends solely on the interests of the United States to maintain global hegemony and the interests of Europe to keep the Horde barbarians(Russians - ed.)away from them.

In this scenario, Ukraine's resources are maximally depleted. Financial and human. And with all the heroism of Ukrainians, we will not be able to liberate our lands on our own.

This scenario is complicated by the fatigue of our donors, our military and civilians from the war.

And the outcome of this scenario does not depend on us.

***

Scenario 2: 'Player'

This is a scenario at the intersection of fields: "Ukraine is a subject" and "Ukraine is not in NATO".

The probability is up to 10%.

Ukraine can be a subject and a "player" only within the framework of the US global interests, as one of the important figures on the global "chessboard".

But for this to happen, Ukraine needs to learn to clearly articulate its strategic goals and become a predictable, contractually capable partner of the United States (which Americans have great doubts about today).

***

Scenario 3: 'Watchtower'

"Ukraine is a NATO member", but "Ukraine is not a subject".

The probability is 30%.

Remember. Countries that do not have their own future strategy are a resource for countries that do!

The collective West is interested in having from us:

  • a controlled buffer zone with Russia;
  • to have a break to prepare for a big war (to replenish the stock of weapons and ammunition);
  • not to risk the lives of their soldiers by outsourcing it.

In this scenario, the West expects Russia to stop trying to continue its terrorist activities.

The occupied territories will not be recognised, but will "hang" indefinitely.

Ukraine will be kept afloat , but there will be no talk of investments.

Ukraine's task in this scenario is to be a "guardian of Europe" - a "physically developed guy who performs his functions for a minimum fee".

The main advantage for Ukraine in this scenario would be

  • respite to accumulate forces and resources;
  • stopping the deaths;
  • protection of the sky and resumption of air traffic with the world;
  • gradual economic recovery within the controlled territories.

***

Scenario 4: 'Europe's security centre'

The intersection of "Ukraine in NATO" and "Ukraine as an entity".

The probability is 20%.

This is probably the most desirable scenario, which:

  • makes Ukraine an important partner of both the EU and the US in the region (essentially, the role of South Korea in Southeast Asia);
  • gives Ukraine not only a respite but also a huge inflow of resources to restore its economy and build a strong defence industry ecosystem based on the Israeli model;
  • gives Ukraine not only an inflow of aid for reconstruction, but also significant investments (the subjective position determines that we clearly understand our priorities, create incentives for their implementation and, as a result, we become very interesting for investors).

As a result, we receive NATO protection, an influx of investments, technologies, and rapid economic growth.

Time is working in our favour in this scenario, as the negative developments in the economies of China and Russia will become more pronounced, creating opportunities for us.

In this scenario, the future of Donbas and Crimea is the future of East Germany, which has finally reunited with West Germany.

***

What are the conclusions?

We all need to adequately assess the strengths and resources that each scenario offers to achieve our long-term goals:

  • security guarantees;
  • restoration of the country's territorial integrity;
  • a strong economy that provides a high quality of life.

And act according to this logic.

For this reason, I would bet on scenario 4, the probability of which is much less than 20% today.

Source

About the author. Anatoliy Amelin, co-founder and director of economic programs at the Ukrainian Institute for the Future

The editors do not always share the views expressed by the authors of the blogs. 


 
Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
5 February
19:54
Russia establishes new foothold on right bank of Oskil River, Kharkiv region
19:30
Explosion near Kamianets-Podilskyi recruitment center kills one, injures four
19:10
Exclusive
Killing of recruitment officer is consequence of Russia's special operations in Ukraine
18:45
Ukraine proposes storing American gas in its facilities
18:20
OPINION
Flaw in "everything was fine if not that damned Putin" narrative
17:55
Russian conscripts sent to Ukraine frontline despite Kremlin’s promises
17:30
Ukraine-U.S. cooperation goes beyond natural resources for mutual benefit — FM Sybiha
17:12
Italy's Bologna hosts protest against Russian disinformation, propaganda
16:50
Ukraine frees 150 defenders from Russian captivity
16:29
OPINION
Trump and Ukraine's rare earth metals
16:07
Exclusive
Ukraine lacks rare earth elements, Trump refers to other minerals — expert
15:50
Company news
How Oschadbank's mobile branch works: the case of Sumy region
15:48
Russia open to talks with Zelenskyy despite not recognizing his legitimacy — Peskov
15:31
Russia’s 'new' Krona-E air defense system: old tech in fresh package
15:10
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 29 – February 5
January 29–February 5 live war map: Ukrainian troops stabilize frontline, battle for every meter near Pokrovsk
15:00
OPINION
Ukraine needs elections, but war makes them impossible
14:43
21 Russian servicemen surrender to Ukrainian forces in Kursk region
14:26
UK Foreign Secretary Lammy visits Kyiv, announces $68M aid package for Ukraine
14:08
Exclusive
Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi risks halting energy security project without USAID funding — deputy mayor
13:50
OPINION
Does Trump have plan?
13:29
IAEA halts mission rotation at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant over Russian security risks
13:12
Putin only wants Ukraine’s next president to be anti-West — Zelenskyy
13:00
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 59
12:56
Ukraine's Defense Ministry deploys robotic units in military brigades
12:48
Updated
Ukrainian forces target oil refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, fire breaks out
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine targets 30 Russian facilities in January — military expert Zgurets
12:15
OPINION
Exchanging Ukraine’s rare earth metals for U.S. military aid is solid deal. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
11:54
Russian conscription fails to offset battlefield losses — ISW
11:32
Review
Ukraine’s military reform: key goals, objectives. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
11:09
Ukrainian forces repel 35 Russian attacks near Pokrovsk, 12 in Kursk region on Feb. 4
10:31
Exclusive
Russia likely increases Shahed drone warhead to 90kg — Kharkiv official
10:13
Over 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in war with Russia — Zelenskyy
09:55
Russia loses 1,140 soldiers, 52 artillery systems, 9 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
More news