Espreso. Global
OPINION

World War III? Let’s support those holding it back

Anna Fechan
27 November, 2024 Wednesday
17:05

It would be bad if your city burned down. This is a reasonable fear to have. What to do, then, if your neighbor’s house is on fire?

client/title.list_title

It would be bad if there were a third world war. That is a reasonable fear to have. By resisting Russia, Ukrainians are making every scenario for such a catastrophe less likely. On the scale of our world, the Ukrainians are the firemen. They are keeping the rest of us safe.

It makes no sense to blame them for Russia's invasion, nor to hinder them from doing their job.  That's no longer fear, but self-destructive panic. Hysteria makes the third world war more likely.

Let's consider, soberly, three familiar scenarios for a third world war: (1) escalation from a conventional war in Europe; (2) escalation from a conventional war in the Pacific; and (3) the spread of nuclear weapons. 

These scenarios for a third world war have not played out because Ukrainians take risks.

Read also: Trump's push to end war in Ukraine seen as weakness in Moscow: Russia rejects 'freeze'

  1.  Europe. The traditional scenario for a third world war since the 1940s has been a great-power conflict in Europe, resulting from an invasion led from Moscow. That invasion has taken place. Despite the predictions of almost everyone, Ukraine has resisted Russia's full-scale invasion, thereby keeping the largest war since 1945 contained on its own territory. This comes at an unimaginable cost for Ukrainians. Ukraine does depend on weapons supplies from its allies. Should we cease these, because of our own fears or for some other reason, Ukraine can lose, and the war will very likely expand.
  2. The Pacific. In the twenty-first century, the main scenario for a third world war has been a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which provokes an American response. That invasion has not taken place and likely will not, so long as Ukraine resists and is able to resist. Whereas the Ukrainians are containing a war in Europe, they are deterring a war in the Pacific. 
  3. Nuclear proliferation. Russia has been blackmailing Ukraine with nuclear war since February 2022. If the Ukrainians had yielded to this nuclear blackmail and not resisted, then the world would now be covered with nuclear weapons. If we cease to support Ukraine, we not only kill the people who have been keeping us safe, we create a world in which nuclear weapons spread and nuclear war is much more likely.

Read also: The West isn’t banking on a “quick peace”

Hysteria leads to the worship of the Big Strong Man and the dream of some easy answer. The people who spread hysteria about the third world war tend to believe in Big Strong Putin and Big Strong Trump.

Big Strong Putin talks about nuclear war, therefore we must panic and force the Ukrainians to surrender. Putin has been talking about nuclear war non-stop for almost three years. The Russians themselves do not take this seriously. The Kremlin knows that there are American hysterics who will be vulnerable to nuclear rhetoric, and so they keep trying. But giving in to Big Strong Putin makes a third world war more likely.

Big Strong Trump spread the fantasy that he could end the Russo-Ukrainian war twenty-four hours after being elected. This was nonsense, as we have seen. The Russians hope to maneuver Trump into cutting off weapons to Ukraine, which would make the war easier for them, though it would not end it. If Trump does cut off weapons deliveries to Ukraine, that would make Ukrainian defeat more likely, which makes a third world war more likely.

The Russo-Ukrainian war is not a television show or a podcast. It cannot be ended by fake masculinity or real hysteria. It cannot be ended by listening to the propaganda of those who started it, nor to the promises that guarantee magical peace. One side will win and another side will lose.

The Ukrainians have taken a titanically difficult situation and made it as easy as possible for us. By resisting they have improved our national security in every possible way. The cost to them on the battlefield, in proportion of lives lost to population, has been about the same as the cost to Americans of both world wars taken together. Nobody in their right mind wants a third world war. So let's not bring it about by abandoning the people who are holding it back.

Source

About the Author. Timothy Snyder, historian, professor at Yale University

The editors don't always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
5 February
19:30
Explosion near Kamianets-Podilskyi recruitment center kills one, injures four
19:10
Exclusive
Killing of recruitment officer is consequence of Russia's special operations in Ukraine
18:45
Ukraine proposes storing American gas in its facilities
18:20
OPINION
Flaw in "everything was fine if not that damned Putin" narrative
17:55
Russian conscripts sent to Ukraine frontline despite Kremlin’s promises
17:30
Ukraine-U.S. cooperation goes beyond natural resources for mutual benefit — FM Sybiha
17:12
Italy's Bologna hosts protest against Russian disinformation, propaganda
16:50
Ukraine frees 150 defenders from Russian captivity
16:29
OPINION
Trump and Ukraine's rare earth metals
16:07
Exclusive
Ukraine lacks rare earth elements, Trump refers to other minerals — expert
15:50
Company news
How Oschadbank's mobile branch works: the case of Sumy region
15:48
Russia open to talks with Zelenskyy despite not recognizing his legitimacy — Peskov
15:31
Russia’s 'new' Krona-E air defense system: old tech in fresh package
15:10
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 29 – February 5
January 29–February 5 live war map: Ukrainian troops stabilize frontline, battle for every meter near Pokrovsk
15:00
OPINION
Ukraine needs elections, but war makes them impossible
14:43
21 Russian servicemen surrender to Ukrainian forces in Kursk region
14:26
UK Foreign Secretary Lammy visits Kyiv, announces $68M aid package for Ukraine
14:08
Exclusive
Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi risks halting energy security project without USAID funding — deputy mayor
13:50
OPINION
Does Trump have plan?
13:29
IAEA halts mission rotation at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant over Russian security risks
13:12
Putin only wants Ukraine’s next president to be anti-West — Zelenskyy
13:00
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 59
12:56
Ukraine's Defense Ministry deploys robotic units in military brigades
12:48
Updated
Ukrainian forces target oil refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, fire breaks out
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine targets 30 Russian facilities in January — military expert Zgurets
12:15
OPINION
Exchanging Ukraine’s rare earth metals for U.S. military aid is solid deal. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
11:54
Russian conscription fails to offset battlefield losses — ISW
11:32
Review
Ukraine’s military reform: key goals, objectives. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
11:09
Ukrainian forces repel 35 Russian attacks near Pokrovsk, 12 in Kursk region on Feb. 4
10:31
Exclusive
Russia likely increases Shahed drone warhead to 90kg — Kharkiv official
10:13
Over 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in war with Russia — Zelenskyy
09:55
Russia loses 1,140 soldiers, 52 artillery systems, 9 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
19:51
Exclusive
Trump's proposal to get rare metals from Ukraine is political move – analyst
More news