Espreso. Global
OPINION

“Maidan judges” may remain in the system. Why is judicial reform stagnating?  

18 July, 2024 Thursday
16:14

Control over the courts has always been important for the presidential hierarchy. It gives absolute power, which leads to authoritarianism or dictatorship. At the same time, the courts should help maintain a balance between the president, parliament, and government. When disputes arise between them, the courts have the final say

client/title.list_title

The role of the courts in history is often crucial. The Constitutional Court ruled that Kuchma's third term was possible. The “second” round was repeated for Yanukovych and Yushchenko, because there was a decision of the Supreme Court, whereas the same court banned the Maidan gatherings (the “wolf court”).

Trust in the judiciary system is extremely low nowadays. Only the trust in parties is lower. And this is not surprising, as the media report that the head of the Supreme Court, Vsevolod Kniazev, was caught on bribes, or that a judge of the same court, Bohdan Lviv, was found to have a Russian passport. 

Without judicial reform, the path to the European Union is closed. But in addition to the influence of the President's Office, the judges themselves are also blocking the reform and trust in the courts. For example, the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court recently adopted a scandalous ruling that allows the “Maidan judges” to remain in the system. This resolution was criticized by the public sector. It weakens the judicial system, which can be utilized by Bankova Street. 

During Yanukovych's presidency, Andriy Portnov and Serhiy Kivalov were the “watchdogs” of the courts. Back then, oligarchs' companies paid a monthly subscription fee to certain judges. The system of case distribution worked like a “Donetsk locomotive”, which means there were cases of interference in choosing the “right judge”.

To reform the courts, the Public Integrity Council was created, and the High Qualification Commission and the High Council of Justice were launched.

That was a step towards the independence of judges from political influence, but the chance was not taken. After the Maidan, the courts were “supervised” by Oleksandr Hranovskyi and Oleksiy Filatov, and thus such odious judges as Bohdan Lviv were appointed to the Supreme Court, which was meant to be reformed from the very beginning. It was he who the Public Integrity Council tried to block in 2017, but he passed.

It is worth noting here that when Bohdan Lviv was found to have a Russian passport, several Supreme Court judges emphasized that Russian citizens have no place in Ukrainian courts. That is, they formed a value core, but not a critical mass. The question arises: why did such an odious judge as Lviv get to the court during the judicial reform, despite the opposition of the Public Integrity Council?

Natalia Sokolenko, a journalist and a member of the Public Council at the time, emphasizes that they had questions for the representatives of the USAID donor responsible for judicial reform. It should be added here that now when it comes to the reform of “urban planning”, the 5655 project lobbied by the head of the Servant of the People party Olena Shulyak, we see the government and donors working together again. For example, MP Anna Bondar of the Servant of the People party said in an interview with the Holka civic initiative that former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksandr Kubrakov went to the US Embassy to negotiate the blocking of funding for the development of an urban planning code which is an alternative to the urban planning “reform.” 

These are very similar trends for the two reforms - judicial and urban planning. If we want real reforms, then it is quite obvious that people like Lviv and Kubrakov not only cannot enter the judicial or political system, but they must be despised by donors.

What has to do with Poroshenko and the judicial reform, he experienced firsthand that it had not been carried out when he left office. Several dozen criminal proceedings were initiated against him. The partners warned against political persecution of the former president.

Under Zelenskyy, the courts were overseen for a long time by Andriy Smirnov, who was only recently fired, but Bankova did not give up trying to influence the courts. 

When it comes to judicial reform, it's not just about Bankova Street. After Maidan, former European Court of Human Rights judge Volodymyr Butkevych emphasized that judges must fight for the independence of the judiciary themselves. This is also their area of responsibility.

The Grand Chamber, which is the pinnacle of the judicial system and whose decisions have an impact on the entire judicial practice, considered the case of Vitaliy Usatyi, a judge of the Kharkiv Regional Economic Court. 

He argued that the decision on his eligibility for the position had to be approved by a panel of three members of the High Qualification Commission, and not by two-thirds of the entire committee, as stated in the law. The Grand Chamber, contrary to its consistent practice over the years, agreed with Usatyi's arguments.

The Grand Chamber has previously considered more than one similar case, but the decisions were not in favor of the judges. The new judicial practice in the case of Judge Usatyi will apply to about 180 other judges whose evaluation has been “delayed” in anticipation of a possible change in the Grand Chamber's position. Among them are the “Maidan judges”. 

The Grand Chamber consists of 21 judges, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. At the time of the scandalous decision on the “amnesty”, there were 17 judges. It is impossible to find out how many of them voted in favor. However, it was possible to find information that 6 of the 17 judges of the Grand Chamber who upheld Usatyi's claim had participated in similar cases before. In those cases, they did not disagree with the Grand Chamber's refusal to satisfy the claims of other judges, despite the fact that the circumstances of the cases were similar.

Could the same judges of the Grand Chamber in 2024 have upheld a decision in Judge Usatyi's case that was opposite to those they had made in other cases? Or was Usatyi's lawsuit granted only by those judges who were elected to the Grand Chamber in 2023?

The Parliament can help bring our judiciary closer to the European one without spending money from the budget by requiring the number of votes ‘for’ and ‘against’ in the collegial decisions of judges. In this case, society would at least have an understanding of the distribution of votes (this practice exists, for example, in the European Court of Human Rights).

And the High Qualification Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice, which will continue to be a filter for the judicial system, will face a challenge after the Grand Chamber's decision in the case of Judge Usatyi. In the near future, it will be possible to see which practice of the Grand Chamber they will use when making decisions on the evaluation of judges. 

Exclusivelly for Espreso.

About the author: Iryna Fedoriv, the Head of the civic initiative “Holka” (The Needle)

The editorial team does not always share the opinions expressed by blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Saturday
8 February
20:00
Review
AIM-120 missiles: how Ukraine’s F-16s, NASAMS counter air, missile threats
19:40
Debate on peacekeepers in Ukraine are “inappropriate and premature”, says Scholz
19:26
Russia's artillery superiority decreased fivefold over past year - Ukraine’s top general
19:05
Putin expands Russian army for war, and not just against Ukraine — Zelenskyy
18:41
Exclusive
Ukraine’s defeat may prove to be strategic catastrophe for West - Russian opposition politician
18:18
Russian airstrike on Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region injures family
17:51
Ukraine’s Kursk operation aims to prevent Russian advance on Sumy, Kharkiv regions - Zelenskyy
17:24
Exclusive
Attacks on Ukrainian military enlistment offices signal new phase of war - Ukrainian officer
16:55
Ukrainian forces shoot down Russian Su-25 in Donetsk region
16:30
Captain involved in killing 59 civilians in Hroza village, Kharkiv region, dies in Russia
15:45
Exclusive
Russian opposition politician warns against dangerous concessions in Ukraine-Russia talks
15:11
Review
Results of Ukraine's Kursk incursion and why North Korean troops don't surrender. Serhiy Zgurets' column
14:41
Ukrainian police evacuate family from Sumy border region amid Russian drone threat
14:10
Exclusive
Russians cut power, communication in occupied territories to move equipment closer to Dnipro River
13:30
Exclusive
Russian troops seek to secure right bank of Oskil River, expand bridgehead in Kharkiv region
13:02
Exclusive
Putin is going to deceive Trump - political scientist
12:28
Hegseth to attend Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting in Brussels
11:58
Drones hit Russia's Rostov-on-Don, targeting Southern Military District HQ, key sites
11:30
 123 combat clashes reported on Feb. 7: Ukrainian forces stopped 30 attacks in Pokrovsk direction
10:50
Mother and child injured in Russian attack on Kherson, houses catch fire
10:25
Ukrainian air defenses shot down 67 out of 139 Russian UAVs, 71 drones lost locally
2025, Friday
7 February
21:10
Exclusive
Trump helps Ukraine trying to reduce Russia's resources for war - political expert Tsybulko
20:50
Old prototype, new hype: Russia displays aging Su-57 in India
20:31
Trump says he may meet with Zelenskyy next week
20:10
Ukrainians in Сongress: Key takeaways from Ukrainian Week in Washington
19:46
OPINION
Avoiding Afghanistan’s fate...
19:20
Exclusive
Mirage 2000 could replace Soviet Su-24s for strikes on Russian targets
18:56
Spanish soldiers practice storming trenches
Spanish army shows how it storms trenches based on Ukrainian military experience
18:31
Claims of Toretsk’s occupation false, fighting continues - DeepState analysts
18:10
Russia's defense industry fails to meet Russian army's needs
17:40
OPINION
Trump, metals, and weapons: Why Ukraine trades lithium and titanium for security guarantees
17:10
Ukraine debunks fake news about Russia’s alleged Oreshnik missile strike on Feb. 6
16:45
Exclusive
'U.S. influence on Russia': military expert on slowdown of Russian advances
16:23
Russian guided bomb downed over Zaporizhzhia: is Ukraine’s air defense entering new era?
16:01
Ukrainian Air Force successfully shoots down Russian guided bomb over Zaporizhzhia
15:40
'Russia tried to kill us': survivors expose truth behind Sudzha airstrike
15:19
Frozen Russian assets are matter of U.S. interest — Ukraine's Deputy Prime Stefanishyna
14:57
OPINION
Elections and large-scale war
14:34
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 22-29
Pokrovsk frontline stabilized, but more concerning front looms — military analyst
14:11
Kremlin forced to respond as reports reveal Russia using donkeys, horses for frontline logistics
More news