Espreso. Global
OPINION

Offensive on Kharkiv. Russians are learning

16 May, 2024 Thursday
14:22

But what kind of Russians? Soldiers at the tactical level, commanders at the operational level, but do stupid Soviet generals learn and can they learn at the strategic level?

client/title.list_title

Actually, I don't believe in it, but we will be able to see for ourselves in the coming months in Kharkiv.

The fact is that an attack on Kharkiv would be a colossal strategic miscalculation by the Russian command. Why? Because it already happened in February 2022. Now the Russians are attacking along the entire front: Robotyne, Krynky, Vuhledar direction, Chasiv Yar, Krasnohorivka, Kupyansk direction. They suffer huge losses every day and need huge replenishment.

 And in the absence of major breakthroughs, they open up another direction. Of course, the goal is to stretch Ukrainian resources. But we are defending ourselves and suffer much less losses. So for the Russians, this means another area of losses in equipment and people, which must be constantly replenished.

I understand that many "smart people" will now start writing to me, saying something about Putin's unlimited meat and resources. I heard it all back in March ‘22, when I argued that the Russians would have to retreat in many areas. There are no unlimited resources, and the more they are spent, the sooner they will run out.

Putin does not like defeats, even the smallest ones. Therefore, there must be advancement in all directions, which means even more forces and resources, which in fact are simply spread over a very long distance of the frontline. At the same time, each kilometer of advance costs hundreds of soldiers and dozens of equipment units.

So, in fact, the opening of the Kharkiv direction is a strategic mistake that they have already made. It was the spreading of troops on 7 invasion directions that led to the disaster of Putin's plans in 2022.

Now for a bit of unpleasant truth. At the strategic level, war looks completely different. It requires maneuvering, stretching the Russian forces, sacrificing something, imposing unwanted battles on them, exhausting them, etc. Therefore, the first and foremost thing that everyone should learn is that a lost territory or settlement is not a catastrophe or defeat. Yes, these are our lands, yes, these are our people, but we need to think about how to win the war, not every battle that the enemy imposes. We are smaller, and with disabled partners, we will never win a war head-on. We need to maneuver, retreat somewhere, counterattack somewhere. The war can only be won by inflicting losses on the enemy that will prevent them from continuing to fight. This is the law of war, which does not depend on our wishes.

As of now, the occupiers' grouping in the Kharkiv direction is almost the same size as in Chasiv Yar. However, Kharkiv is not Chasiv Yar, where the Russian advance is stalled. Therefore, it is obvious that no large-scale offensive on Kharkiv is currently planned. The enemy's goal is to capture a number of settlements and bind Ukrainian forces in their attempts to recapture them.

So should we go along with this plan, when the real direction of the orcs' attack is Chasiv Yar and Vuhledar?

As a military man, I can tell you that I had a full understanding of the Russian actions in the Kharkiv region from the inside. Believe me, they were expected, and the defense forces are more than sufficient. There is a certain plan that our command is implementing, and the Kharkiv direction is a story in which you should trust the Ukrainian Armed Forces. And there is no need to get hysterical at the first bad news. Unfortunately, I am less optimistic about other areas.

Western aid has reached us in a very limited form. If we had everything that has already been allocated, the occupiers would not even be able to cross the border. But this is not the case. When you start writing about mining, you don't realize that we already have serious problems even with mines. And fighting with limited resources and exhausted brigades is really about military talent.

So, amid the bad news about the occupied villages of Kharkiv region, there is also good news - the Russians  continue to be led by the same stupid creatures who planned the worst invasion operation in history. Sooner or later, this will affect the war. Just like it did in ‘22.

Source

About the author. Victor Andrusiv, political and public figure, analyst and publicist.

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the authors of the blogs.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Friday
17 January
16:34
Exclusive
Trump's team knows losing Ukraine means China wins war – politician Rybachuk
16:15
How Russia’s ties with Iran shape war in Ukraine
16:00
Updated
Ukraine-Southeast Europe ministerial meeting in Kyiv issues joint communiqué
15:56
Review
Flying nonstop for over two days: inside Penguin drones supporting Ukrainian forces at front
15:35
Exclusive
Ukrainian general names three key strategic targets for Ukraine's long-range strikes on Russia
15:12
Russia's inflation surges as Central Bank faces political pressure
14:51
Russian drone attacks Ukrainian Witness filming crew in Zaporizhzhia sector
14:34
BTR-D
Russian forces use sunk BTR-Ds to create river crossings in Kursk
14:27
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Kryvyi Rih leaves four dead, several injured
14:15
OPINION
Ukrainian refugees at risk: why is Slovakia threatening to halt aid?
13:33
Ukraine to introduce basic military training in universities
13:11
Exclusive
Russian forces try to surround Velyka Novosilka from almost all directions — military expert
12:54
OPINION
"Deal of the century": grandiose rhetoric, but still missing the mark
12:30
Ukrainian forces hit Russian radar equipment in Belgorod region
12:10
Exclusive
Europe either wakes up this year or becomes Russia’s next target — Ukrainian diplomat
11:50
Exclusive
Russian forces fail to cross Oskil River in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region — Ukrainian officer
11:33
Russia launches drone barrage on Ukraine, injures child in Kyiv
11:13
Russia's attacks cause nearly one-third increase in civilian casualties in Ukraine in 2024
10:55
Russian diplomats gain unauthorized access to restricted UK Parliament area
10:36
Review
New UK agreement: financial aid, deployment of peacekeepers to Ukraine. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
10:13
Ukraine reports 141 combat clashes, halts 53 Russian attacks in Pokrovsk direction
09:54
German FM criticizes Scholz government over €3 billion aid delay to Ukraine
09:32
Russia loses 1,670 soldiers, 13 armored vehicles, 12 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Thursday
16 January
21:20
Updated
Zelenskyy responds to Polish presidential candidate opposing Ukraine’s EU, NATO membership
20:54
Exclusive
Moscow unlikely to agree to peacekeepers in Ukraine - Institute of World Policy
20:33
Exclusive
Trust in U.S., West declines among Ukrainians - survey
20:10
Exclusive
Russia struggling to counter Ukrainian strikes on oil depots
19:51
From canal to battlefield: Russia’s push against Chasiv Yar
19:33
Exclusive
Russian forces push to expand foothold toward Borova in Kharkiv region
19:12
Exclusive
Pokrovsk holds strategic value for Putin, but he won't succeed — general Malomuzh
18:51
North Korean troops choose death over capture: military expert explains why
18:30
UN plans to raise $2.6 billion for Ukraine in 2025
18:09
Russian forces launch 31 attacks in Pokrovsk direction, most repelled by AFU
17:50
EU should delay Russia sanctions decision until Trump inauguration, Hungary says
17:30
'Russia will get our response': Zelenskyy on drone attack during meeting with Starmer in Kyiv
17:12
Russia's latest missile strike: spontaneous move or strategic shift?
16:53
Ukrainian Border Guard and Defense Forces halt Russian convoy near border
16:36
Ukraine, U.S. top generals discuss frontline situation in war with Russia
16:12
Exclusive
Why Scholz hesitates to approve €3B aid for Ukraine before election: analyst explains
15:51
Updated
Ukrainian forces strike Liskinskaya oil depot in Russia's Voronezh region
More news