All versions of terrorist attack in St. Petersburg are bad for Russia

Possible Russian versions of those responsible for Tatarsky/Fomin’s death:

1. The first version implicates Ukrainian special services, which would be highly detrimental for the Russian Federation. If they attempt to prove this theory, they will essentially acknowledge their inability to protect bloggers, which could prompt a significant shift in their rhetoric about the war.

If they attempt to prove this theory, they will essentially acknowledge their inability to protect bloggers

2. Another possibility is that the conflict is between Prigozhin and Shoigu. This scenario is also unfavorable as it implies that the conflict has extended beyond the realm of information warfare, raising questions about the future of the military campaign.

This could lead to the creation of militant groups similar to the Socialist-Revolutionary party in 1917

3. Finally, there is a third theory that anti-war activists may have been responsible for the attack, which is equally concerning for Russia. Such an event would suggest that Russian protest movements are becoming more aggressive and could lead to the creation of militant groups similar to the Socialist-Revolutionary party in 1917. Historically, when the tsarist regime held the population in check, the response was often violent, such as the terror employed by militant groups. Regardless of the scenario, this situation supports the prediction that Russia is headed for a turbulent period similar to the events of 1917.

All versions have bad consequences for Russia.

Source

About the author. Viktor Andrusiv, political and public figure, analyst and publicist

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.