Espreso. Global
OPINION

Is America really unprepared for major war?

31 July, 2024 Wednesday
13:04

Despite concerns, America's strategic moves in Europe and South Asia indicate a careful approach to safeguarding interests rather than seeking immediate conflict

client/title.list_title

Amid the flood of recent information, an article in The Economist titled "America Is Unprepared for a Major War" draws attention

The conclusion is based on the results of a bipartisan commission that has analyzed Biden's National Defense Strategy for two years.

If you approach the facts superficially, without considering the motives of the experts, authors, and possibly the sponsors, you might be left with a rather unpleasant impression that "we're all doomed and there's nothing to be done." According to this view, despite the belligerent and enthusiastic speeches from military leaders of various ranks, the U.S. appears to be in a state of uncertainty and vulnerability, where any external intervention (primarily military) could topple the "world's policeman" façade.

However, in my humble opinion, The Economist may be somewhat exaggerating the situation.

“Of course, war is not a spectacle or a leisurely march through the capitals of potential aggressors. Naturally, every effort is made to avoid it through diplomacy, economic leverage, promises, and compromises. Indeed, any hot confrontation disrupts the global order, business connections, and devastates human lives.”

But the real point of the bipartisan commission’s statement, I believe, is different: America is not currently prepared for war. And not just at this moment. The article directly references sources that outline the state described by analysts: "In 2018, the Trump administration canceled the previous requirement for the Pentagon to be prepared for two major wars simultaneously, one in Europe and one in Asia. The Biden team maintains these reduced ambitions," the source is quoted. Most bipartisan discussions are now focused not on global issues or reckless actions in Africa or Oceania, but on domestic problems.

But the real point of the bipartisan commission’s statement, I believe, is different: America is not currently prepared for war. And not just at this moment. The article directly references sources that outline the state described by analysts: "In 2018, the Trump administration canceled the previous requirement for the Pentagon to be prepared for two major wars simultaneously, one in Europe and one in Asia. The Biden team maintains these reduced ambitions," the source is quoted. Most bipartisan discussions are now focused not on global issues or reckless actions in Africa or Oceania, but on domestic problems.

Therefore, Putin's "special military operation" in Ukraine was initially perceived as another escalation by a chronic imperialist, which - at the time, according to Washington (and other capitals as well) - was expected to end with Kyiv's capitulation or new agreements, likely at Ukraine's expense. It was only the desperate resistance of the Ukrainians and their ability to significantly challenge the "second strongest army in the world" that brought world leaders to their senses, making it clear that the world could change drastically if they simply "wash their hands."

I believe that the publication in The Economist is nothing more than a smokescreen, a component of hybrid warfare, an attempt to provoke careless enthusiasts to more openly reveal their intentions.

Note that, despite the "unpreparedness" for major wars, America is enhancing its potential in Europe, preparing to relocate air defense systems closer to the Russian borders, and planning to deploy Tomahawks in Germany. Additionally, the U.S. is showing significant activity in the South Asian region, actively laying the groundwork for creating a NATO-like alliance there. To quote The Economist again: "On July 28, the Biden administration took a significant step in this direction by announcing the creation of a new “combat” headquarters in Japan to command all army, air, and naval forces in the country."

Clearly, the issues of ordinary Americans do not extend to distant and often unfamiliar corners of the globe. However, their prosperity is based on the relentless advancement of American interests precisely in those remote areas. If a presidential candidate can effectively explain this to them in simple terms, they will undoubtedly succeed. Especially since, as the commission warns, "a major war will impact the lives of every American in ways we can only imagine."

The same Trump, with his pretended "isolationism" fueled by the whims of MAGA adventurers, never tires of claiming that he will "end the war in Ukraine with one phone call." And this is not merely a play on words; it is a statement laced with hints of blackmail and military pressure on Russia.

The Democrats are not as categorical in their statements - after all, Kamala Harris has not yet been officially nominated as the candidate by the party convention. However, it is clear that the current president has done so much for Ukraine that his potential successor will carefully consider whether it is worth ending the previous administration’s policy, given the astronomical sums already spent.

Therefore, I think America is ready for a major war (or even several in different theaters). But common sense and mercantile interest continue to motivate its administration not to take a fatal step.

Especially for Espreso

About the author: Ihor Hulyk, journalist.

The editors don't always share the views expressed by blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Friday
17 January
19:10
Exclusive
Military expert Zgurets addresses claims of 'manipulation' in WWII-era mine report
18:50
OPINION
Rubio understands Putin’s true goal
18:31
Russia’s Putin, Iran’s Pezeshkian sign strategic partnership agreement
18:10
Press release
Serhiy Zgurets' materials are reliable, free of manipulation: Espreso on controversy around publication on outdated mine procurement
17:54
In Kryvyi Rih, man lost his second wife in Russian attack, having buried his first during Kherson's occupation
17:35
97 clashes reported on Russian-Ukrainian front on Jan.17: tense situation in Pokrovsk sector
17:19
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Kryvyi Rih leaves four dead, several injured
17:14
OPINION
From powerhouse to prison: Russia’s descent under Putin
16:53
Ukrainian forces neutralize, capture Russian soldiers behind execution of two POWs
16:34
Exclusive
Trump's team knows losing Ukraine means China wins war – politician Rybachuk
16:15
How Russia’s ties with Iran shape war in Ukraine
16:00
Updated
Ukraine-Southeast Europe ministerial meeting in Kyiv issues joint communiqué
15:56
Review
Flying nonstop for over two days: inside Penguin drones supporting Ukrainian forces at front
15:35
Exclusive
Ukrainian general names three key strategic targets for Ukraine's long-range strikes on Russia
15:12
Russia's inflation surges as Central Bank faces political pressure
14:51
Russian drone attacks Ukrainian Witness filming crew in Zaporizhzhia sector
14:34
BTR-D
Russian forces use sunk BTR-Ds to create river crossings in Kursk
14:15
OPINION
Ukrainian refugees at risk: why is Slovakia threatening to halt aid?
13:33
Ukraine to introduce basic military training in universities
13:11
Exclusive
Russian forces try to surround Velyka Novosilka from almost all directions — military expert
12:54
OPINION
"Deal of the century": grandiose rhetoric, but still missing the mark
12:30
Ukrainian forces hit Russian radar equipment in Belgorod region
12:10
Exclusive
Europe either wakes up this year or becomes Russia’s next target — Ukrainian diplomat
11:50
Exclusive
Russian forces fail to cross Oskil River in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region — Ukrainian officer
11:33
Russia launches drone barrage on Ukraine, injures child in Kyiv
11:13
Russia's attacks cause nearly one-third increase in civilian casualties in Ukraine in 2024
10:55
Russian diplomats gain unauthorized access to restricted UK Parliament area
10:36
Review
New UK agreement: financial aid, deployment of peacekeepers to Ukraine. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
10:13
Ukraine reports 141 combat clashes, halts 53 Russian attacks in Pokrovsk direction
09:54
German FM criticizes Scholz government over €3 billion aid delay to Ukraine
09:32
Russia loses 1,670 soldiers, 13 armored vehicles, 12 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Thursday
16 January
21:20
Updated
Zelenskyy responds to Polish presidential candidate opposing Ukraine’s EU, NATO membership
20:54
Exclusive
Moscow unlikely to agree to peacekeepers in Ukraine - Institute of World Policy
20:33
Exclusive
Trust in U.S., West declines among Ukrainians - survey
20:10
Exclusive
Russia struggling to counter Ukrainian strikes on oil depots
19:51
From canal to battlefield: Russia’s push against Chasiv Yar
19:33
Exclusive
Russian forces push to expand foothold toward Borova in Kharkiv region
19:12
Exclusive
Pokrovsk holds strategic value for Putin, but he won't succeed — general Malomuzh
18:51
North Korean troops choose death over capture: military expert explains why
18:30
UN plans to raise $2.6 billion for Ukraine in 2025
More news