Espreso. Global
OPINION

Is America really unprepared for major war?

31 July, 2024 Wednesday
13:04

Despite concerns, America's strategic moves in Europe and South Asia indicate a careful approach to safeguarding interests rather than seeking immediate conflict

client/title.list_title

Amid the flood of recent information, an article in The Economist titled "America Is Unprepared for a Major War" draws attention

The conclusion is based on the results of a bipartisan commission that has analyzed Biden's National Defense Strategy for two years.

If you approach the facts superficially, without considering the motives of the experts, authors, and possibly the sponsors, you might be left with a rather unpleasant impression that "we're all doomed and there's nothing to be done." According to this view, despite the belligerent and enthusiastic speeches from military leaders of various ranks, the U.S. appears to be in a state of uncertainty and vulnerability, where any external intervention (primarily military) could topple the "world's policeman" façade.

However, in my humble opinion, The Economist may be somewhat exaggerating the situation.

“Of course, war is not a spectacle or a leisurely march through the capitals of potential aggressors. Naturally, every effort is made to avoid it through diplomacy, economic leverage, promises, and compromises. Indeed, any hot confrontation disrupts the global order, business connections, and devastates human lives.”

But the real point of the bipartisan commission’s statement, I believe, is different: America is not currently prepared for war. And not just at this moment. The article directly references sources that outline the state described by analysts: "In 2018, the Trump administration canceled the previous requirement for the Pentagon to be prepared for two major wars simultaneously, one in Europe and one in Asia. The Biden team maintains these reduced ambitions," the source is quoted. Most bipartisan discussions are now focused not on global issues or reckless actions in Africa or Oceania, but on domestic problems.

But the real point of the bipartisan commission’s statement, I believe, is different: America is not currently prepared for war. And not just at this moment. The article directly references sources that outline the state described by analysts: "In 2018, the Trump administration canceled the previous requirement for the Pentagon to be prepared for two major wars simultaneously, one in Europe and one in Asia. The Biden team maintains these reduced ambitions," the source is quoted. Most bipartisan discussions are now focused not on global issues or reckless actions in Africa or Oceania, but on domestic problems.

Therefore, Putin's "special military operation" in Ukraine was initially perceived as another escalation by a chronic imperialist, which - at the time, according to Washington (and other capitals as well) - was expected to end with Kyiv's capitulation or new agreements, likely at Ukraine's expense. It was only the desperate resistance of the Ukrainians and their ability to significantly challenge the "second strongest army in the world" that brought world leaders to their senses, making it clear that the world could change drastically if they simply "wash their hands."

I believe that the publication in The Economist is nothing more than a smokescreen, a component of hybrid warfare, an attempt to provoke careless enthusiasts to more openly reveal their intentions.

Note that, despite the "unpreparedness" for major wars, America is enhancing its potential in Europe, preparing to relocate air defense systems closer to the Russian borders, and planning to deploy Tomahawks in Germany. Additionally, the U.S. is showing significant activity in the South Asian region, actively laying the groundwork for creating a NATO-like alliance there. To quote The Economist again: "On July 28, the Biden administration took a significant step in this direction by announcing the creation of a new “combat” headquarters in Japan to command all army, air, and naval forces in the country."

Clearly, the issues of ordinary Americans do not extend to distant and often unfamiliar corners of the globe. However, their prosperity is based on the relentless advancement of American interests precisely in those remote areas. If a presidential candidate can effectively explain this to them in simple terms, they will undoubtedly succeed. Especially since, as the commission warns, "a major war will impact the lives of every American in ways we can only imagine."

The same Trump, with his pretended "isolationism" fueled by the whims of MAGA adventurers, never tires of claiming that he will "end the war in Ukraine with one phone call." And this is not merely a play on words; it is a statement laced with hints of blackmail and military pressure on Russia.

The Democrats are not as categorical in their statements - after all, Kamala Harris has not yet been officially nominated as the candidate by the party convention. However, it is clear that the current president has done so much for Ukraine that his potential successor will carefully consider whether it is worth ending the previous administration’s policy, given the astronomical sums already spent.

Therefore, I think America is ready for a major war (or even several in different theaters). But common sense and mercantile interest continue to motivate its administration not to take a fatal step.

Especially for Espreso

About the author: Ihor Hulyk, journalist.

The editors don't always share the views expressed by blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
19:51
Exclusive
Trump's proposal to get rare metals from Ukraine is political move – analyst
19:35
"We are open to U.S. investments": Zelenskyy responds to Trump's statement on rare earth elements
19:08
Ukraine to introduce mandatory psychological aid training for doctors – First Lady
19:02
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 52
18:50
Exclusive
Ukrainian forces may have to withdraw from Chasiv Yar – military analyst
18:33
Von der Leyen urges EU to find "most creative way" to use Russian assets for Ukraine
18:15
Exclusive
Western weapons can now strike deep into Russia, but new problem emerges
17:54
U.S., Ukraine did not discuss elections before 2025 — Ambassador Markarova
17:34
Updated
"The situation is critical": IAEA chief visits key substations vital for Ukraine's nuclear power plants
17:14
Russian national hockey team banned from 2026 World Championship
16:55
Ukraine’s HIV response at risk amid U.S. aid freeze
16:33
Support for military aid to Ukraine declines in Poland
16:15
Russia equips Gerbera foam drones with warheads
15:56
Ukraine’s parliament approves defense loan agreement with UK
15:32
Ukrainian troops release GoPro footage of repelling Russian assault, eliminating two squads
15:14
OPINION
Ukraine’s power sector withstands winter challenges, but risks remain
14:55
Ukraine’s embassy facilitates meetings between Zelenskyy, Trump teams — Ambassador
14:33
Hopes for Russian democracy met harsh reality – Ex-MP Kendzior on Ukrainian diaspora in 1990s
13:57
Review
Russian advance slows down, how Ukrainian Armed Forces approaches change. Serhiy Zgurets' column
13:35
U.S. firefighters document impact of Russian strikes in Ukraine, set to release second film
13:16
Exclusive
Ukraine takes key step in reforming Armed Forces management system – military expert
12:55
Norway provides significant aid to Ukraine but profits from war-driven revenues
12:34
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 15-22
Russian forces scale back assaults in Pokrovsk sector: Ukrainian officer explains why
12:14
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 22-29
Russian forces pushing to launch battle for Kostiantynivka, Donetsk region
11:51
Ukraine retakes positions in Kupyansk, Russian command threatens troops with execution for retreating
11:32
OPINION
Where will Putin and Trump meet?
11:15
North Korean troops no longer fighting in Russia’s Kursk region — South Korean intel
10:53
110 clashes reported at front as Russian forces launch over 6,000 attacks on Ukraine
10:34
Russian army continues to suffer heavy losses despite slowing offensive – ISW
10:13
Scholz calls Trump’s proposal to trade Ukrainian rare earths for U.S. aid "very selfish"
09:54
Russian overnight attack on Ukraine: UAV debris hits Kyiv high-rise, fires in Cherkasy
09:35
Russia loses 1,270 soldiers, 92 drones, 18 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Monday
3 February
22:00
Nearly 63,000 people are missing in Ukraine
More news