Espreso. Global

Threat from Belarus: how fast can Russia build a strike force?

Sofia Polonska
19 February, 2025 Wednesday
20:25

Zelenskyy warns that Russia could deploy up to 150,000 troops in Belarus, raising security concerns in Europe

client/title.list_title

 Is this a realistic scenario, and what is Russia's current capability to form such a strike force? Ukrainian military observer Oleksandr Kovalenko has analyzed the situation.

Cold reality check

The Ukrainian president’s words shocked many in Europe, as he openly addressed a very real threat that many in the West prefer to ignore—even after three years of bloodshed in Ukraine.

Notably, just before Zelenskyy’s speech in Munich, Denmark's Foreign and Military Intelligence Service published the "Forecast 2024" report, which warned of the risk of a Russian invasion of Europe within the next five years—or possibly even sooner.

Regardless, is it truly difficult to imagine Russia forming such a strike force in Belarus? Or is it more plausible than it seems?

Ukraine’s bitter experience

Europe should remember the past—specifically, 2022—when, under the guise of the "Union Resolve-2022" military exercises, Russia deployed a 40,000-strong force to Belarus, which then invaded Ukraine on February 24.

At the time, this was the largest Russian troop concentration ever stationed in Belarus. Nearly all these troops had full equipment and short-term reserves.

In other words, Russia has experience deploying a significant contingent in Belarus. They could do it again under the pretext of the "Zapad-2025" military exercises.

Current composition of Russian troops in Belarus

At present, there are just over 2,000 Russian military personnel stationed in Belarus. They are deployed across several sites:

  • Radio-technical hub Baranovichi and 43rd communication hub Vileyka – about 1,450 personnel.
  • Airfields in Baranovichi, Zyabrovka, and Mozyr – about 530 personnel.
  • 313th garrison military prosecutor's office and 484th military investigative department – about 20 personnel.
  • 1405th artillery ammunition base (military unit 42707, Velyka Horozha, Osipovichi district) – about 20 personnel.
  • Wagner PMC – around 100 members.

Most of these troops operate air defense systems, electronic warfare (EW), and radio-electronic reconnaissance (RER) systems, as well as support personnel. In other words, they do not constitute a ground combat force capable of participating in large-scale offensive operations.

But could this force grow to the 150,000 troops mentioned by Zelenskyy? How much time would it take, and under what conditions?

Forming a Russian Strike Force in Belarus

It is important to note that, given the intensity of combat in Ukraine and Russia’s current losses, it is not feasible for Russia to quickly increase its forces in Belarus to 150,000. However, under what conditions could it be possible? The answer is straightforward: if combat operations in Ukraine cease or their intensity significantly decreases.

If we imagine a scenario where fighting in Ukraine completely stops, Russia—currently losing 45,000–48,000 troops per month in killed and wounded—would reduce these losses to nearly zero. Meanwhile, Russia would continue mobilizing 30,000–40,000 troops per month.

By the end of May, this would mean an additional 90,000–120,000 troops. By the end of August, that number could rise to 180,000–240,000. With basic training for mobilized personnel, the first batch of 90,000–120,000 soldiers would be combat-ready by June.

Even if a ceasefire does not occur, and we only see a reduction in combat intensity—leading to lower Russian losses of 10,000–20,000 troops per month—Russia's current mobilization rates would still allow it to accumulate forces and form new units, including those deployed in Belarus.

Expanding military infrastructure in Belarus

There are already signs of preparations for a military buildup in Belarus. Construction projects are underway at several military facilities with direct Russian involvement. For example, new infrastructure for personnel and equipment is being built at the 1405th artillery ammunition base in Velyka Horozha, Osipovichi district.

Therefore, if Russia intends to form a force for an attack on Europe, all it needs is a halt to active combat in Ukraine. However, this does not solve the issue of equipping these units with military hardware.

While Russia can supply the manpower for such a force, it lacks the necessary equipment. Even if the fighting in Ukraine stops, Russia’s military-industrial complex cannot fully outfit a 150,000-strong strike force. Instead, it would consist largely of infantry formations organized as marching battalions within makeshift infantry corps—essentially resembling Soviet-style rifle divisions.

Still, given how Russian commanders handle their troops, this would not be seen as a major operational or ethical issue for them. However, for countries like Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, it could become a serious threat—one they might struggle to counter due to NATO’s slow, bureaucratic response mechanisms.

Military-technical support from Belarus

It is also possible that Russian units in Belarus could be reinforced with equipment from the Belarusian army. This tactic was used in 2022, both during the battles in northern Ukraine and after Russian troops withdrew.

Logistics between Russia and Belarus remain highly efficient. In 2024 alone, Russia has sent 216 railcars with military cargo to Belarus, including air defense systems, ammunition, and armored vehicles for ground forces.

Conclusion

At present, Russia is suffering such heavy losses in Ukraine that it cannot pose an immediate threat to European countries. However, as soon as its losses decrease—or are eliminated altogether—that threat will escalate dramatically.

In a January article on OBOZ.UA titled "After a Year of 'Silent Guns,' the Kremlin May Reuse an Old Scenario: How Realistic Is an Invasion of Europe?"  it was detailed how Russia could build up its forces if it faced no further battlefield losses.

But considering all possible scenarios, shorter timelines for forming strike groups that could extend the battlefield into Europe must also be examined. If a ceasefire or drastic reduction in Russian losses occurs, Moscow could indeed form the “strike force” Zelenskyy warned about at the Munich Security Conference—posing a real threat not only to Ukraine but also to the European Union.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Monday
17 March
15:56
Moscow’s civilian economy shows growing signs of crisis – Resurgam
15:40
Zelenskyy signs law permitting deployment of Ukrainian Armed Forces abroad during martial law
15:30
Ukraine and South Korea discuss repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war
15:10
OPINION
Putin's strategy for 30-day ceasefire
14:55
German FM urges Trump to avoid concessions to Putin that could harm Ukraine
14:29
Russia's two-month tank losses near Pokrovsk exceed entire Bundeswehr stock
14:06
EU council approves €3.5 billion aid to Ukraine under Ukraine facility
13:46
Hungary won’t fund weapons for Ukraine with taxpayers' money — FM
13:25
EU Defense Ministers to discuss military aid package for Ukraine in Warsaw on April 2-3
13:05
Kremlin confirms Trump’s statement about upcoming call with Putin
12:58
Exclusive
"Locker isn’t bottomless": expert on Putin’s economic resources for war
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine must be prepared for new challenges: political analyst on potential Trump-Putin call
12:17
Russian ceasefire conditions show Moscow doesn’t want peace – Kallas
11:56
Exclusive
Trump pushes for ceasefire to improve relations with Putin - political analyst
11:34
Exclusive
Military expert assesses potential for Russian offensive on Ukraine’s Sumy region
11:16
U.S. to withdraw from international group investigating Russia’s war crimes against Ukraine
10:57
Ukraine denies reports of troops encirclement in Kursk region
10:29
U.S. in talks with Russia on strategic access to Ukrainian ports, nuclear facilities
10:11
Russian UAV attack causes infrastructure damage and blackouts throughout Ukraine
09:51
Ukraine outlines "red lines" for peace negotiations
09:35
Russia loses 1,210 soldiers, 19 tanks, 37 artillery systems in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Sunday
16 March
20:47
Exclusive
"Stopping Russia’s advance in Pokrovsk direction signals Ukraine seizing initiative" – NGU Reserve Major
20:33
Trump’s narrative clashes with battlefield reports: What Ukrainian soldiers are really seeing
20:00
Review
Ukraine deploys Wolly combat module for safer frontline defense
19:41
Exclusive
Russia ignored its own laws in staging Crimea referendum – expert Voloshyna
19:16
Ukraine appoints new chief to head General Staff
18:48
64 combat clashes on Russian-Ukrainian frontline today, 11 in Pokrovsk sector
18:25
Britain considers sending 10,000 troops to Ukraine
18:11
Interview
Putin likely to try to deceive Trump, restarting negotiations with unpredictable consequences – diplomat Bryza
17:37
Exclusive
China watches as Russia’s reset with the U.S. collapses
17:18
Russia's troop losses exceed 100,000 in 2025 – Ukraine's top general
16:50
Russia's hopes to buy time – President of Finland
16:25
Turkey reaffirms support for Ukraine on Crimea annexation anniversary
16:22
Trump, Putin likely to hold phone talks next week — Witkoff
16:03
U.S. volunteers join Ukraine’s army after Trump’s policy shift
15:47
Russia fires over 1,020 drones, 1,360 guided bombs, and 10+ missiles at Ukraine over one week — Zelenskyy
15:06
OPINION
Radio Svoboda's closure reveals West's reluctance to fight Russia’s information warfare
14:39
"Time for Russia to come to table in good faith": Canada's new PM Carney speaks with Zelenskyy
14:11
Exclusive
Russian troops unable to move equipment across Oskil River – Ukrainian military
13:38
OPINION
U.S. shutting down Radio Liberty, Voice of America is a natural process and elections outcome
More news