Espreso. Global
OPINION

The prospect of freezing the war?

4 March, 2024 Monday
11:15

In my analysis of the scenarios for 2024-2025, I observed that the inertial scenario—essentially, the current trajectory—is the worst-case scenario for Ukraine. This scenario entails a war of attrition accompanied by the erosion of Western support, leading, consequently, to a significant diminution of Ukraine's capacity to resist

client/title.list_title

However, I did not identify this inertial scenario as the most probable outcome, which is a departure from the norm since the inertial scenario usually stands as the most likely. The deviation in this case arises because there are significant forces at work aiming to disrupt the current trajectory and shift towards a more favorable scenario. This is exactly what we have now.

I identified the second scenario, the freezing of the conflict, as the most likely one, a prospect that seemed entirely implausible last year. This is because both Ukrainian society and Putin, who opted for the first scenario of a war of attrition, were opposed to the idea of freezing the war.

Three months on, and the scent of the second scenario—the freezing of the conflict—starts to permeate the atmosphere. It remains an unpalatable option for both Ukrainian society and the Russian leadership. Yet, it is something America and Europe are increasingly finding necessary. The European industry requires it to bolster its defense mechanisms. European leaders see it as essential for preparing their societies for impending changes. For Biden, it's pivotal to approach the polls with the image of a peacemaker. Trump, on the other hand, sees it as an opportunity to fault Biden for his shortcomings and to bridge the divide created by internal party conflicts. For all Ukrainian politicians, this scenario presents a chance to conduct elections and secure victories, with each harboring hopes of winning.

Yet, even the two principal opponents of this scenario cannot claim to have an unwavering stance. Broadly speaking, Ukrainian society has not reconciled itself with the absolute necessity for mobilization. Politicians are procrastinating over passing the law, and there's a noticeable absence of public demand to expedite the process. The people serving on the front lines are neither immortal nor invulnerable, yet, surprisingly, even the voices of their millions of relatives seem to fade into the background, drowned out by television broadcasts.

Similarly, Putin, while continuing his aggressive rhetoric, sends rather mixed signals. We do not know what is disguised and what is real, because we do not know the real state of the Russian economy. We don't know whether the Kremlin believes that time is playing against them or against us. We are not even sure who time is playing for.

China is behind all this. Despite having a strategy that positions it to benefit from either the continuation or cessation of the war, it's not clear if China views the advantages of a truce as outweighing other outcomes. It is quite plausible that it does, given that China faces economic challenges which the ongoing war only exacerbates.

Let me remind you that the scenario of freezing the war envisages a second phase of aggression in 3-5-7 years after Russia has restored its capabilities and learned from the mistakes of the first phase. This means that the destructive impact of the second phase may be greater. To this end, Russia and Ukraine must intensively prepare for this phase - Ukraine with the help of the West, Russia with the help of China.

However, the success of Ukraine's preparations hinges significantly on the electoral outcomes: should modernizers secure a victory, it would likely lead to the accelerated modernization of both the military and state institutions, potentially averting a second phase of the war. Conversely, if populists come to power, it could result in inadequate preparations and jeopardize Ukrainian statehood, aligning with Putin's strategic objective.

So, it is very likely that in the near future we will be urged from different sides to freeze, appease, ceasefire, etc.

This means that Ukrainian society urgently needs an open and honest dialog on three key issues:

1. Is a ceasefire acceptable when, on one hand, Ukraine faces a shortage of weapons, a slowdown in mobilization, and there is an opportunity for holding elections, while on the other hand, Russia remains poised to breach the truce at any moment? Additionally, there's the risk of people with intentions to disarm Ukraine and Europe gaining power in the United States. In essence, the question is: does time favor us or our enemies?

2. If the answer to the first question is yes, then what are the red lines that cannot be crossed under any circumstances? Obviously, the list of red lines includes the inadmissibility of

  • any "demilitarization" because it is an invitation to continue aggression
  • giving up European and Euro-Atlantic integration, as this would mean that 10 years have passed in vain
  • recognizing the change in the political status of the occupied territories, as this is a violation of the Constitution.

Simultaneously, certain concessions will be necessary, and the delineation of societal red lines requires thorough and high-quality discussions.

3. If the answer to the first question is negative, as a society, what steps should we take to ensure that the refusal to negotiate and the persistence of the war do not result in the loss of lives and eventual defeat, but instead propel us towards victory?

And this public dialog should begin with an exploration of the definitions of victory and defeat. This isn't a binary scenario but rather a spectrum encompassing partial victories and defeats, as well as instances of neither. What do the words we use every day mean? Do all segments of society understand them in the same way? Where is the line between acceptable and unacceptable?

This is what we need to talk about in the near future.

Source

About the author. Valeriy Pekar, lecturer at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2024, Sunday
13 October
19:50
North Korea's soldiers set up training ground near Mariupol - partisans
19:20
How loss of Pokrovsk will affect Ukrainian steel industry: The Economist explains
18:58
Interview
Ben Hodges: Balance is beginning to shift slightly in Ukraine’s favor
18:33
How Australia scrapped MRH90 Taipan helicopters requested by Ukraine and sold spare parts
18:10
One of Russia's four reconnaissance An-30s aircraft spotted over Syria
17:40
Exclusive
People gather in support of Ukrainian prisoners of war on Kyiv Glory Square
17:16
Over 36,000 residents evacuated from Sumy region, including 6,469 children
16:44
Russian army reaches highway connecting Kupyansk with Borova in Kharkiv region
16:15
Ukrainian Olha Liashchuk becomes strongest woman in America
15:45
Exclusive
"Police must act": Paramedic demands high-quality tourniquets for AFU
15:15
In one week, Russians unleash 900 bombs, over 40 missiles, 400 drones on Ukraine
14:30
Exclusive
Wagner PMC replacement: Portnykov on potential arrival of North Korean troops to Ukraine
13:45
Russia strikes Zaporizhzhia region with 170 drones in a single day
13:14
Exclusive
Russian troops escalating operations to encircle Ukrainian forces in Kurakhove – military expert Sniehyriov
13:10
Updated
Russian forces execute 9 Ukrainian POWs in Kursk region, Ukraine urges action from UN, ICRC
12:40
DeepState on Chasiv Yar: "Relentless Russian assaults — if they bring in reserves, situation will get difficult"
11:38
Affiliate Material
Rebuilding Kharkiv region: damage scope and main challenges of recovery
11:10
"We’re holding defined lines": Zelenskyy updates on Kursk region situation
10:40
Russian army loses 2 air defense systems, 1,300 soldiers, 9 tanks in one day in Ukraine
2024, Saturday
12 October
20:08
94 clashes occur on Russian-Ukrainian frontline, with Russia pushing in Kurakhove direction
19:40
OPINION
On war fatigue and ending scenarios
19:15
Military expert comments on North Korean soldiers in Russia
19:02
Exclusive
Russia fails to fully benefit from capturing Vuhledar - former U.S. Army Commander in Europe
18:35
Russian army strikes civilian car with FPV drone in Kupyansk, injuring two
17:59
OPINION
NATO's perspective: Ukraine is not Germany
17:33
Ukrainian football coach awarded Golden Cross killed in action
17:02
Six days later: Crimean oil depot fire still burning after Ukrainian attack
16:33
Exclusive
Three reasons Moscow won't use nuclear weapons, according to political scientist
16:02
Russian army attacks warehouses in Ukraine's Mykolaiv region in random strikes
15:29
Over 300 chaplains from 13 religious organizations serve in Ukraine’s Armed Forces
15:05
Exclusive
Resource factor may play decisive role in battle for Toretsk - military expert
14:43
Interview
War in 19: Ukrainian combat medic Sandra on Hospitallers, her love for people, and Sudzha
14:12
Russia conducts 21 strikes in Donetsk region, killing two, wounding three people
13:40
Review
Russian army conducts assault operations in Kursk region, intensifies offensive with use of equipment in Kupyansk sector. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
13:01
OPINION
What are allies preparing for Ukraine?
12:33
Army chief Syrskyi: "Ukraine has positive dynamic in destroying enemy targets with drones'"
11:59
Russia plans to manufacture Shahed drones at captured factories in Ukraine
11:35
Russian forces attack Ukraine with Shaheds, KABs overnight
10:59
Russia loses 1,290 soldiers in one day of war in Ukraine
10:33
Ukrainian military destroys Russian fuel depot in Luhansk region
More news