Espreso. Global
OPINION

'Best' bad peace plan

7 December, 2024 Saturday
18:53

Appeasement instead of peace: Western partners intensely deliberate over ending the war in Ukraine

client/title.list_title

The EU sincerely hopes that Trump’s plans for Ukraine will also take European security interests into account. Meanwhile, the future president appears to have entirely different expectations.

Europe is openly frightened by the Kremlin, yet it is not abandoning Ukraine. Thus, the European wing of NATO is preparing a plan to end the war based on a "neither ours nor theirs" formula. But let’s not rush to condemn them.

Brussels is currently less concerned with the status of the occupied territories and more focused on security guarantees for Ukraine—namely, creating safeguards to protect the country in the post-war period without excessively provoking Moscow's dictator (as Bloomberg writes, "avoiding provoking Putin").

Western partners no longer speak about "seeking paths to victory" or "prospects of NATO membership" but instead promise to provide Kyiv with twice as much weaponry. They call this "strengthening Ukraine's negotiating position amid the escalation of Russian aggression." Increased supplies have also been mentioned by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Alliance foreign ministers.

"After the war ends (or the hot phase of the conflict, depending on how things unfold), the partners are considering creating a demilitarized zone to be patrolled by European forces—a concept reportedly supported by the British, French, and later the Germans."

It’s worth noting that the European wing of the Alliance would prefer to start negotiations with the Kremlin to resolve the situation "as soon as possible," before Trump steps onto the geopolitical stage with his sledgehammer approach to peacemaking. The apparent calculation is to ensure that the new-old occupant of the White House doesn’t reinvent the wheel but instead adopts Europe’s plan.

Effectively, the Old World has declared that it is ready to listen to the Kremlin elder and refuses to consider Ukraine's NATO membership in the foreseeable future. This is because it would mean crossing Russia's red lines, as Moscow sees Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. On the other hand, Europeans prefer not to see Russian troops on Ukraine's western border, which is why they are showing some activity.

“Meanwhile, Kyiv is forced to acknowledge that what was once considered the worst-case scenario for ending the war has become the best: agreeing to begin a peace process—without the 1991 borders. This ‘coming out’ was necessary for political rapprochement with Trump’s team. A Ukrainian delegation was in the U.S., and here are two pieces of news.”

The bad news is that Trump’s advisers officially continue to adhere to a strategy of pressuring Ukraine, rewarding Putin with trophies in the form of 20%+ of Ukrainian territory, and blocking Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic integration.

The good news is that pressure will not only be placed on Ukraine. Trump’s special representative on Russia’s war against Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, supported Biden’s efforts in “rushing weapons supplies to Ukraine.” As Kellogg stated, “this will give Trump leverage over Moscow in settlement negotiations” (The Wall Street Journal).

Overall, it’s still too early to say what version of a "peace plan" the White House under Trump will intellectually conceive. The U.S. has no shared borders with either Russia or Ukraine attacked by Putin. Thus, the final version may rely less on geopolitical rationality and more on the diplomatic ease of its implementation.

Trump needs an urgent success and the ability to focus on battling internal enemies and detractors, for which external ones must be appeased. Of course, in practice, U.S.-Russia rapprochement will not be so straightforward, as there are many obstacles on the path to reconciliation. Striking a global peace deal involving a redistribution of spheres of influence is unlikely to happen right away.

It is logical to assume that a potential global Trump-Putin 2025 agreement on Ukraine would primarily entail a ceasefire and years-long negotiations between the aggressor, its victim, and a staggering number of mediators. Such is the "best" bad plan.

Source

About the author. Orest Sohar, journalist, Obozrevatel editor-in-chief.

The editors don't always share the opinions expressed by the authors of the blogs.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
5 February
16:07
Exclusive
Ukraine lacks rare earth elements, Trump refers to other minerals — expert
15:50
Company news
How Oschadbank's mobile branch works: the case of Sumy region
15:48
Russia open to talks with Zelenskyy despite not recognizing his legitimacy — Peskov
15:31
Russia’s 'new' Krona-E air defense system: old tech in fresh package
15:10
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 29 – February 5
January 29–February 5 live war map: Ukrainian troops stabilize frontline, battle for every meter near Pokrovsk
15:00
OPINION
Ukraine needs elections, but war makes them impossible
14:43
21 Russian servicemen surrender to Ukrainian forces in Kursk region
14:26
UK Foreign Secretary Lammy visits Kyiv, announces $68M aid package for Ukraine
14:08
Exclusive
Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi risks halting energy security project without USAID funding — deputy mayor
13:50
OPINION
Does Trump have plan?
13:29
IAEA halts mission rotation at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant over Russian security risks
13:12
Putin only wants Ukraine’s next president to be anti-West — Zelenskyy
13:00
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 59
12:56
Ukraine's Defense Ministry deploys robotic units in military brigades
12:48
Updated
Ukrainian forces target oil refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, fire breaks out
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine targets 30 Russian facilities in January — military expert Zgurets
12:15
OPINION
Exchanging Ukraine’s rare earth metals for U.S. military aid is solid deal. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
11:54
Russian conscription fails to offset battlefield losses — ISW
11:32
Review
Ukraine’s military reform: key goals, objectives. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
11:09
Ukrainian forces repel 35 Russian attacks near Pokrovsk, 12 in Kursk region on Feb. 4
10:31
Exclusive
Russia likely increases Shahed drone warhead to 90kg — Kharkiv official
10:13
Over 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in war with Russia — Zelenskyy
09:55
Russia loses 1,140 soldiers, 52 artillery systems, 9 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
19:51
Exclusive
Trump's proposal to get rare metals from Ukraine is political move – analyst
19:35
"We are open to U.S. investments": Zelenskyy responds to Trump's statement on rare earth elements
19:08
Ukraine to introduce mandatory psychological aid training for doctors – First Lady
18:50
Exclusive
Ukrainian forces may have to withdraw from Chasiv Yar – military analyst
18:33
Von der Leyen urges EU to find "most creative way" to use Russian assets for Ukraine
18:15
Exclusive
Western weapons can now strike deep into Russia, but new problem emerges
17:54
U.S., Ukraine did not discuss elections before 2025 — Ambassador Markarova
17:34
Updated
"The situation is critical": IAEA chief visits key substations vital for Ukraine's nuclear power plants
17:14
Russian national hockey team banned from 2026 World Championship
16:55
Ukraine’s HIV response at risk amid U.S. aid freeze
More news