Espreso. Global
OPINION

The long war can end suddenly

16 February, 2024 Friday
16:05

I have already said and written that Putin's main achievement in 2023 was to impose a long war on everyone

client/title.list_title

However, a long war does not mean that it will simply drag on for years, somewhat like the Anti-Terrorist Operation. A long war means that the parties have reached a balance of power, have enough resources to continue fighting, but not enough to turn the tide.

Nevertheless, a long war can end suddenly. I have already written that in a long war, the original goals and reasons for the war lose their meaning for all parties. The only thing the parties are fighting for is "not to lose," but this struggle is exhausting them more and more and creates the preconditions for a sudden end.

This is what happened in the First World War, with which the current situation at the front is often compared. Back in June 1918, the Germans were 56 kilometers from Paris, and on August 8, the Allied operation of Amiens actually marked the beginning of the end of the war. It was not a total defeat; the Allies advanced about 11 kilometers, the Germans lost 74,000 soldiers (including POWs), and the Allies lost 46,000.

The reason for the Allies' success was different: the morale of the Germans was broken. They began to surrender and retreat en masse. The troops were severely exhausted and demoralized, the economy was depleted, politics suffered from revolutionary movements, and the far from the most powerful Allied operation triggered a domino effect, and on August 13, the German bet began to discuss the issue of an armistice.

A long war is won not so much by military force, as we saw in the First World War, but by other important factors:

1. The fighting and morale of the army and society. Lack of ammunition, equipment, unsuccessful operations, enemy successes - all this can break the spirit of soldiers and people. It doesn't manifest in people just saying "let's stop.” On the contrary, at first they begin to agree to change the goals and reasons for the war. For example, "we don't need Crimea anymore". Later, they increasingly want to end the war and don't care how it ends.

2. Trust. A change of leadership at any level is a serious risk for a governance system that is under serious enemy pressure. Changing the leadership is not only possible, but necessary. Leadership changes are not only feasible but sometimes imperative. After all, factors like burnout, "blurred vision," or being overstretched do come into play. However, these changes must never erode the trust of the army and society.

Hence, the replacement of a trusted leader necessitates a comprehensive explanation of the reasons behind such a decision. Moreover, any change should only involve a leader who commands an equal measure of support and trust.

3. Management system. When a war starts, it quickly mobilizes the best people and resources. As the war drags on, the more cunning, vile and corrupt ones start to win. This once again confirms the thesis that changes are necessary. But at the same time, the system works as a whole. If any unit falls out due to a crisis in leadership, the entire system is affected.

As I said, our war has become long, but it can end suddenly. The crucial factor is ensuring that we are not the instigators of this sudden turn.

Source

About the author. Victor Andrusiv, political and public figure, analyst and publicist

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
5 February
16:50
Ukraine frees 150 defenders from Russian captivity
16:29
OPINION
Trump and Ukraine's rare earth metals
16:07
Exclusive
Ukraine lacks rare earth elements, Trump refers to other minerals — expert
15:50
Company news
How Oschadbank's mobile branch works: the case of Sumy region
15:48
Russia open to talks with Zelenskyy despite not recognizing his legitimacy — Peskov
15:31
Russia’s 'new' Krona-E air defense system: old tech in fresh package
15:10
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 29 – February 5
January 29–February 5 live war map: Ukrainian troops stabilize frontline, battle for every meter near Pokrovsk
15:00
OPINION
Ukraine needs elections, but war makes them impossible
14:43
21 Russian servicemen surrender to Ukrainian forces in Kursk region
14:26
UK Foreign Secretary Lammy visits Kyiv, announces $68M aid package for Ukraine
14:08
Exclusive
Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi risks halting energy security project without USAID funding — deputy mayor
13:50
OPINION
Does Trump have plan?
13:29
IAEA halts mission rotation at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant over Russian security risks
13:12
Putin only wants Ukraine’s next president to be anti-West — Zelenskyy
13:00
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 59
12:56
Ukraine's Defense Ministry deploys robotic units in military brigades
12:48
Updated
Ukrainian forces target oil refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, fire breaks out
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine targets 30 Russian facilities in January — military expert Zgurets
12:15
OPINION
Exchanging Ukraine’s rare earth metals for U.S. military aid is solid deal. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
11:54
Russian conscription fails to offset battlefield losses — ISW
11:32
Review
Ukraine’s military reform: key goals, objectives. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
11:09
Ukrainian forces repel 35 Russian attacks near Pokrovsk, 12 in Kursk region on Feb. 4
10:31
Exclusive
Russia likely increases Shahed drone warhead to 90kg — Kharkiv official
10:13
Over 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in war with Russia — Zelenskyy
09:55
Russia loses 1,140 soldiers, 52 artillery systems, 9 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
19:51
Exclusive
Trump's proposal to get rare metals from Ukraine is political move – analyst
19:35
"We are open to U.S. investments": Zelenskyy responds to Trump's statement on rare earth elements
19:08
Ukraine to introduce mandatory psychological aid training for doctors – First Lady
18:50
Exclusive
Ukrainian forces may have to withdraw from Chasiv Yar – military analyst
18:33
Von der Leyen urges EU to find "most creative way" to use Russian assets for Ukraine
18:15
Exclusive
Western weapons can now strike deep into Russia, but new problem emerges
17:54
U.S., Ukraine did not discuss elections before 2025 — Ambassador Markarova
17:34
Updated
"The situation is critical": IAEA chief visits key substations vital for Ukraine's nuclear power plants
More news