Espreso. Global
Interview

Ukraine, Russia face critical moment on frontline — Colonel Grant

3 March, 2024 Sunday
16:14

Retired British Army Colonel, military expert Glen Grant tells Espreso TV about the critical situation at the front and the change in strategy by the Ukrainian Armed Forces' new leadership

client/title.list_title

How do you see the situation on the contact line? What should we expect from the Russian offensive?

The first thing is, it's a closely fought battle and both sides are pushing hard, possibly due to the elections in Russia.

General intelligence reports suggest that the Russian side, although appearing strong, is not as formidable as it may seem. However, they are fully committed to the battle, indicating limited reserves or additional support.

Furthermore, there are reports of extra ammunition from North Korea, in addition to their own production. This puts the Russian forces in a much stronger position compared to the Ukrainian troops, who have been forced to retreat and are now consolidating their defenses along the river lines west of Avdiivka.

It is hoped that these defensive lines have been adequately prepared to withstand the pressure. However, it is evident that the Ukrainian side is facing challenges due to a lack of personnel and ammunition, compounded by limitations in support from America and Europe.

The outcome of this battle could be decisive. If Ukraine manages to hold the river line, it will buy them time to stabilize the front and strategize for the future. However, if Russia breaks through, the coming months could prove to be extremely challenging.

How powerful is the enemy's offensive after Avdiivka? How do you see the Russian General Staff's plan?

The main Russian aim is to exhaust Ukraine and achieve a breakthrough, without a doubt. Putin perceives the West as being weak currently, providing him with a favorable opportunity to launch a strong attack. It's evident that if a side lacks sufficient ammunition and manpower, it becomes vulnerable to attacks as its weakness is exploited by the opposition.

On the Ukrainian side, we did not help ourselves by holding onto our positions for as long as we did, particularly in places like Avdiivka. This decision has cost us dearly in terms of resources that could have been better utilized in a more strategically prepared position along a straight line. Holding a pocket like Avdiivka requires significantly more soldiers compared to defending a straight line.

Russia will undoubtedly continue pushing and utilizing all available resources, especially with the upcoming elections in Moscow, where Putin needs to demonstrate success not just in one town but across the board to validate his entire battle plan.

Hence, this is a critical juncture for both Ukraine and Russia.

We can see that the front line is extremely active in the Kupyansk sector, Donetsk region and southern Ukraine. What direction can the enemy use or try to make a strategic offensive?

It's difficult to predict for two reasons. Firstly, it will depend on their success. Remember that the Russian Doctrine is to reinforce success. Therefore, their strategy will likely be to assess which of the areas they are pushing hardest shows the most vulnerability. They are not only attacking but also scouting for weaknesses. Whichever area appears weakest, they will reinforce it with additional ammunition and manpower to maintain pressure and potentially break through the defensive line.

Where can the enemy concentrate its resources, Kupyansk or the south of Ukraine?

Again, it's difficult to make a definitive assessment at this point.

While we have access to intelligence regarding Russian activities, it's important to recognize that the Ukrainian side ultimately determines the direction of the Russian attack. If the Ukrainian forces hold their ground, Russia may continue its current strategy. However, if any part of the Ukrainian defense begins to falter, such as the situation in Avdiivka, Russia is likely to focus its efforts there.

It's premature to speculate whether Russia will intensify its attacks in a specific area. There's significant pressure in multiple regions, including the south near Mariupol and the western front near Avdiivka. It may take another two weeks or so to assess how effectively the Ukrainian defense is holding in these areas before we can gauge where Russia will concentrate its efforts.

It's essential to acknowledge that predicting Russia's actions is challenging until they identify areas of success against Ukraine, which will guide their strategy.

If we talk about asymmetric actions on our part, what areas should we focus on?

Certainly, the primary target of strategic importance is the Kerch Bridge. Its destruction would disrupt transportation to Crimea, forcing Russia to rely on sea or overland routes, both of which pose logistical challenges. Additionally, any delays in damaging the railway bridges would further impede Russian movements.

While I acknowledge the value of asymmetric actions, I doubt their immediate effect on the frontline against Russia's formidable resources and capabilities. Our primary focus should remain on fortifying and defending the frontline. Effective asymmetric strategies often require advanced weaponry such as long-range missiles and increased sea drone capabilities, which we currently lack in sufficient quantity.

Asymmetric actions only truly exert power when directly linked to frontline operations. Merely targeting the rear may not yield the desired frontline impact unless executed with strategic ingenuity. An example from World War II illustrates the strategic value of disrupting key industrial targets like power plants and ball bearing factories, as they are essential for enemy machinery and mobility. Today, disrupting electronic chip production could similarly hinder enemy capabilities, but Russia's access to these components from abroad complicates this approach. Sanctions play a crucial role in limiting Russia's fighting capacity by targeting essential supplies like artillery ammunition. 

Ultimately, frontline combat training and the mastery of essential artillery and drone capabilities remain irreplaceable components of our defense strategy. These fundamentals, combined with innovative approaches, are essential in confronting Russia's military might effectively.

​​Hundreds of Russian soldiers are killed every day, enemy aircraft are shot down, the enemy is regrouping, and changes are taking place in the Russian military districts. What can this mean? There is a feeling that a new stage of the Russian-Ukrainian war is coming. How would you characterize it?

On the Russian side, it's evident that they are rapidly learning, adapting, and evolving their battle strategies at a pace surpassing that of the Ukrainian general staff. Their effectiveness in implementing these changes is undeniable.

However, as I've emphasized before, Ukraine must find a way to outmaneuver the Russians strategically. Creating uncertainty and disrupting their rear positions has proven effective in causing them to retreat, as seen at Izium. Even well-trained troops have fled when faced with this situation, just got on the bicycles and ran away. When the Russians find themselves outflanked, they become vulnerable and are more likely to break.

The danger lies in engaging the Russians head-on in a conventional, Soviet-style battle. In such scenarios, Russia's numerical superiority, greater ammunition supply, and overall equipment advantage make them stronger than Ukraine. Therefore, it's imperative to reassess our approach to this conflict and consider alternative strategies.

Continuing to confront Russia using the same tactics they employ against us will only lead to further retreats on our part. It's essential to think innovatively and employ tactics that exploit Russia's vulnerabilities.

What about new military districts?

I don't believe there's a clear logic set behind things yet. We need time for study and to understand the implications of some of the Russian changes. It seems they are attempting to innovate and conduct the war at a new level, but their exact intentions are not yet clear.

​​What will the spring and summer campaign look like? Will the enemy dare to open additional frontline areas, particularly in Belarus?

It's uncertain.

Nobody fully understands the situation due to the various factors at play. General Syrskyi and his new team aim to change the approach to fighting, which is the first variable. If they succeed, it could lead to a shift in the dynamics of the conflict. However, without such changes, there is a risk of either a stalemate or further territorial losses for Ukraine.

The second variable is whether the Ukrainian defense system will establish a proper training system, as currently, there isn't one in place. Improved training could significantly enhance the quality of Ukrainian forces and their effectiveness in combat.

The third variable concerns the support from Europe and the US, particularly in terms of financial aid. If Congress allocates funds, Ukrainian troops will have access to more ammunition and resources, improving their ability to fight.

The fourth variable is Belarus. While it remains independent for now, I think I would say that, but there is an election coming this year and we don't know what will happen in Lukashenko's mind. I mean we know he'll be reelected because there's no election. Of course, it's just like Russia. It's just that he will become the president with probably with a hundred and forty seven percent of the vote or something ridiculous, but we don't know them whether he will play positively on the side of Putin having been reelected or whether Belarus will stay independent and there will not be any more threat from from the north.

You need to look at each of these variables and test them. And certainly as a society needs to be asking what changes are going to be made from the military because it's pointless changing all the commanders and putting new commanders in place. If there is no change after those commanders, if they just carry on doing the same, then we might not as well have changed them because there's no nothing different. So we will be looking to see and the West will be looking to see that there is a positive dynamic with new commanders towards a Western way of fighting and not continuation of the Soviet fighting and a Western way of training.

Recently, European leaders met in Paris, and the French president promised to increase military support. To what extent is it realistic for Ukraine to expect, for example, military assistance with personnel from our European friends?

Firstly, let's clarify that there's nothing particularly new about this situation. This is merely another step forward along the same trajectory. Macron's acknowledgment of the threat to Europe is more about political maneuvering to bolster his own image and influence within Europe, rather than genuine concern for Ukraine. Any supposed "new" actions or support from France could have been provided months ago, highlighting the political nature of his statements.

It's worth noting that French deliveries of support often fall short of expectations, and this tendency should temper any excitement over their promises. While some Northern European countries like Estonia, Finland, and Poland have taken tangible steps to address the situation, many other European nations fail to grasp the gravity of the threat they face without American support.

Macron's statements lack the necessary force and energy to indicate genuine commitment. If he were truly serious, we would see French troops deployed to Ukrainian soil promptly. However, his rhetoric suggests more talk than meaningful action. Serious countries prioritize action over talk, and Macron's approach seems to prioritize rhetoric over tangible efforts.

Regarding the United Nations, it's important to recognize its limited effectiveness and influence. It's just a talking shop. It has as much energy behind it as any of the supermarket chains in Europe. In other words, it's nothing. Similarly, the European Union has yet to fully grasp the urgency of the situation and take decisive action.

In summary, despite the rhetoric and discussions, there is little indication of substantial change or meaningful action. The absence of concrete steps, such as deploying troops to Ukraine, suggests that the current situation is more characterized by talk than genuine transformation.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2024, Thursday
18 July
21:30
Review
Victorious news of 876th day of war: Ukrainian drones hit Russian Coast Guard base in occupied Crimea, Ukrainian combat system certified to NATO standards
21:15
OPINION
Von der Leyen's re-election is good news for Ukraine
21:00
Exclusive
UK needs negotiator: international expert Kraiev on Johnson's meeting with Trump
20:44
Ukraine returns 758 children from Russia and occupied territories
20:24
Ukraine signs security agreements with Czech Republic, Slovenia
20:01
UNHCR to provide $100 million to help Ukraine prepare for winter
19:40
Russia creates “law enforcement“ groups from locals in occupied territories
19:23
Russian T-54 tank
Russians showed echelon of T-54 tanks in Moscow region, which grabbed attention
19:00
Russian Shahed drones enter Belarusian airspace for reason - military expert
18:40
Russia shells Kherson: one killed and wounded, humanitarian mission vehicle damaged
18:24
Exclusive
Putin is in critical situation, he has no systemic reserves - General Malomuzh
18:00
Russia attacks Donetsk region: 5 people killed, several wounded
17:34
OPINION
There is no peace in Putin's "peace agreements"
17:16
British intelligence assesses how Russia aims to tighten state control over Internet platforms
16:54
'Zelenskyy went all-in on promises from West, lost everything': foreign manipulations on July 18
16:36
Ukraine to jam Russian signals in frontline regions
16:14
OPINION
“Maidan judges” may remain in the system. Why is judicial reform stagnating?  
15:58
Review
Trump's assassination attempt: impact on 2024 US election
15:39
Ukrainian drones hit Russian Coast Guard base in occupied Crimea
15:18
Von der Leyen criticizes Hungary's Orbán over trip to Russia
15:06
Updated
Ukraine's President Zelenskyy arrives in UK for European Political Community summit
14:54
Ukraine delivers 1,000 tons of wheat flour to Gaza
14:40
Exclusive
No Russian combat ship remains in Crimea - Ukrainian Colonel Selezniov
14:08
Reports surface of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Krynky; military says "situation not so critical"
13:52
July 8 Kyiv attack update: Mayor Klitschko reports 23 hospitalized, including 3 children
13:33
Ukraine launches register of international humanitarian law violations during Russian aggression
13:11
Ukrainian army withdraws from Urozhaine, Donetsk region - Khortytsia troop grouping
12:52
Ukrainian combat system certified to NATO standards for first time in history
12:35
Exclusive
Fires ravage Chasiv Yar amid Russian shelling - Ukraine's 24th Brigade
12:14
Review
All citizens of Ukraine should undergo military training, mobilization offices should be replaced by app for conscripts. Serhiy Zgurets' column
11:54
OPINION
How to defeat Russia?
11:33
144 clashes occur at front, Ukraine repels most attacks in Toretsk direction - Ukraine's General Staff
11:08
Exclusive
"We are witnessing turning point": military expert on course of war in Ukraine
10:50
Exclusive
Russian troops set to launch new offensive in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region - local official
10:36
Pro-Russian Czech media spread Russian fakes about the Russian missile attack on Children's hospital in Kyiv
10:11
Russia takes 91 Ukrainian children under occupation to militarization camps
09:54
Russia loses 1,130 soldiers, 54 artillery systems, and 50 drones in one day of war in Ukraine
09:36
Russian troops shell 16 settlements in Kherson region, injuring 6 civilians
2024, Wednesday
17 July
21:00
Review
Victorious news of 875th day of war: 95 Ukrainian defenders released from Russian captivity, Ukrainian military destroys 28 Russian ships since 2022
20:40
Ukraine launches Saving Lives of Servicemen program, focusing on training, medical care, recreation
More news