Espreso. Global
OPINION

As soon as Ukraine runs out of resources, war will spread globally

21 June, 2024 Friday
20:00

For the past two years, the West has been desperately trying to avoid World War III

client/title.list_title

It limits the use of its weapons to strike Russia. It does not even try to shoot down missiles flying over its territory. The idea of sending instructors to Ukrainian training grounds scares it. Time and again, it repeats the need to "avoid escalation."

It wants to keep the war limited to just Russia and Ukraine, keeping it under control geographically. The West is trying hard to stick to its usual ways of doing things, seeing our war as the main problem.

It's a good effort, but it probably won't work.

History doesn't repeat itself; it only rhymes. But if we look for a relevant analogy in twentieth-century history for Ukraine, it would be pre-war Czechoslovakia. The difference is, unlike then, Ukraine isn't alone; it's receiving support with money and weapons. The current situation feels like 1940, but without the Wehrmacht invading Poland, occupying France, or bombing British cities - it's still testing its military strength against the Czechoslovak army.

''This is a peculiarity of the situation. Our partners behave as if this is exclusively our war, not noticing that our resistance ensures their peace.''

Europe owes its stability to Ukraine. We buy them time to rearm and increase military budgets. Our experience helps them adapt to modern warfare. Europeans now have the opportunity to learn from a war between two professional armies, as their previous military experience was mostly dealing with guerrilla movements.

''When they think about the war's outcomes, they fear a Russian defeat because it could lead to nuclear threats, the empire's collapse, a Baltic front, and sabotage in Europe. But they should also consider the aftermath if Ukraine loses.''

Millions of refugees, camps, and repression could occur, like new Mariupols and Buchas. There would be a humanitarian crisis with Russian tanks near NATO borders. Most importantly, Moscow would see it as winning the first phase against NATO.

The West may not perceive itself as a party to the conflict, but it is much more important that Moscow considers it a party to the conflict. Russia operates under its own logic, viewing the war not against an independent state but against the vanguard of a hostile empire. If Ukraine falls, Moscow might see it as a sign of weakness and try to build on its success.

The Kremlin has moved on from the old era, unlike our partners. That's why Germany refuses to supply Ukraine with Taurus missiles. That's why the United States asks not to bomb Russian oil refineries. That's why Poland calls for restrictions on Ukrainian exports to Europe. Against this backdrop, France, which promises to give Ukraine decommissioned military equipment instead of scrapping it, appears determined.

''But here's the twist: Ukraine is seen as a dam, shielding Europe from a global war. If this dam breaks, the world will have to stop flirting with their farmers find them military uniforms, and send them to the trenches.''

Our war remains bilateral and localized only because we are still holding on. Once we lack the resources to continue, the war will spread globally. The empire has no borders, it has only horizons. If the Russian president believes that the world in which he grew up is ideal, then you can look at maps of Europe in the 1970s.

Our situation is not a deviation, historical mistake, or dictator's whim - it's a reality that was destined for everyone, but our country happened to be in the way. If we lose, those who survive will always be able to say the sacramental "we warned you". The key is having someone left to say it.

The question isn't if European weapons will be used, but who will use them. Will Ukraine use them, allowing neighbors to remain in supportive roles? Or will Europe, tired of war, leave Ukraine to fend for itself?

Had Czechoslovakia not been abandoned, World War II's outcome might have been different. World War III is not starting just because Ukraine continues to fight.

Source

About the author: Pavlo Kazarin, journalist.

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the authors of the blogs.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2025, Wednesday
5 February
16:50
Ukraine frees 150 defenders from Russian captivity
16:29
OPINION
Trump and Ukraine's rare earth metals
16:07
Exclusive
Ukraine lacks rare earth elements, Trump refers to other minerals — expert
15:50
Company news
How Oschadbank's mobile branch works: the case of Sumy region
15:48
Russia open to talks with Zelenskyy despite not recognizing his legitimacy — Peskov
15:31
Russia’s 'new' Krona-E air defense system: old tech in fresh package
15:10
Exclusive
Ukraine Russia war live map, January 29 – February 5
January 29–February 5 live war map: Ukrainian troops stabilize frontline, battle for every meter near Pokrovsk
15:00
OPINION
Ukraine needs elections, but war makes them impossible
14:43
21 Russian servicemen surrender to Ukrainian forces in Kursk region
14:26
UK Foreign Secretary Lammy visits Kyiv, announces $68M aid package for Ukraine
14:08
Exclusive
Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi risks halting energy security project without USAID funding — deputy mayor
13:50
OPINION
Does Trump have plan?
13:29
IAEA halts mission rotation at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant over Russian security risks
13:12
Putin only wants Ukraine’s next president to be anti-West — Zelenskyy
13:00
Updated
Russian ballistic missile strike on Ukraine’s Izyum kills 5, injures 59
12:56
Ukraine's Defense Ministry deploys robotic units in military brigades
12:48
Updated
Ukrainian forces target oil refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, fire breaks out
12:37
Exclusive
Ukraine targets 30 Russian facilities in January — military expert Zgurets
12:15
OPINION
Exchanging Ukraine’s rare earth metals for U.S. military aid is solid deal. Column by Vitaly Portnikov
11:54
Russian conscription fails to offset battlefield losses — ISW
11:32
Review
Ukraine’s military reform: key goals, objectives. Serhiy Zgurets’ column
11:09
Ukrainian forces repel 35 Russian attacks near Pokrovsk, 12 in Kursk region on Feb. 4
10:31
Exclusive
Russia likely increases Shahed drone warhead to 90kg — Kharkiv official
10:13
Over 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in war with Russia — Zelenskyy
09:55
Russia loses 1,140 soldiers, 52 artillery systems, 9 tanks in one day of war in Ukraine
2025, Tuesday
4 February
21:45
Gimli robotic complex joins Ukraine's army, aiding in evacuation and resupply
21:30
Exclusive
When could Ukraine hold elections after the war? Lawyer explains
21:12
Ryanair plans to resume flights to Lviv, Kyiv 4-6 weeks after war ends
20:57
Black Sea tankers wreck: IMO holds Russia responsible
20:40
"Don't let them drain resources": military commander reacts to Trump
20:23
Polish Military Institute of Armament Technology, Ukrainian NAUDI agree to cooperate
20:07
Exclusive
USAID funding freeze: Expert Riabtsev on potential risks for Ukraine’s energy sector
19:51
Exclusive
Trump's proposal to get rare metals from Ukraine is political move – analyst
19:35
"We are open to U.S. investments": Zelenskyy responds to Trump's statement on rare earth elements
19:08
Ukraine to introduce mandatory psychological aid training for doctors – First Lady
18:50
Exclusive
Ukrainian forces may have to withdraw from Chasiv Yar – military analyst
18:33
Von der Leyen urges EU to find "most creative way" to use Russian assets for Ukraine
18:15
Exclusive
Western weapons can now strike deep into Russia, but new problem emerges
17:54
U.S., Ukraine did not discuss elections before 2025 — Ambassador Markarova
17:34
Updated
"The situation is critical": IAEA chief visits key substations vital for Ukraine's nuclear power plants
More news