Espreso. Global

Europe has 6-9 years before Russia attacks

23 November, 2023 Thursday

This is somewhat surprising given the confused and financially pessimistic statements made by allies in recent months. In Germany, they came to their senses and assessed the prospects of Russia's attack on NATO, if they were given a truce to enable mobilization and weapon production. The destruction of the Russian army in Ukraine was recognized as the only option for countering the Kremlin's plans

This is actually a very unexpected statement. We have already managed to come to terms with the unfortunate prospects of support, with the fact that the allies still have a Russia-centric assessment of global prospects. And all of a sudden.

Dated November 8, 2023, a report from the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), which is an official organization, not a private warmongering initiative, by the way, suggests: NATO member countries in Europe have 6 to 9 years left before Russia attacks.

More precisely, the Russian Federation will need 6-9 years to restore its army and armed potential to a level where it might contemplate attacking NATO. The "Mortal Countdown" will begin from the moment of cessation of intensive hostilities in Ukraine — that is, from the onset of the ceasefire that all allies and neutrals are leaning towards.

When the Armed Forces no longer pose threats, Russia will swiftly shift all available production to military goods for maximum stockpiling (so as not to borrow from Kim Jong Un and exchange with Iran during the height of hostilities).

Dr. Christian Mölling from DGAP and Torben Schütz from the Center for Security and Defense in Berlin estimate that Russia could train approximately 280,000 new recruits annually. In six years, this number could reach 1.7 million (they do not make a discount for Russians constantly dying from alcohol abuse). Over a decade, there could be 2.8 million Russians of the suitable age undergoing military training. This includes those with actual combat experience in Ukraine, Syria, or elsewhere.

Consequently, NATO must be prepared for potential conflict in 5-8 years, ideally a year before the Russian military industry and army's deadline. This means restocking warehouses, disposing of outdated items (Ukraine using them against the Russians), replacing them with modern equivalents, and addressing insufficient production for the required number of shells, weapons, and equipment. Only this approach can, to some extent, ensure the deterrence of Russia's potential military aggression.

German analysts have outlined five crucial steps for NATO's survival.

  1. Ensure backing for the Armed Forces to enhance their capability against Russia in potential future offensives on Ukrainian soil.
  2. Integrate Ukraine into the European defense sector. Recognize Ukraine's enduring geostrategic significance for European security due to its proximity to Russia and Belarus. 
  3. Balance relations with the US, putting in the necessary efforts to bolster Germany's own military strength.
  4. Impose stringent sanctions to hinder the Russian military industry.
  5. Germany should fortify the Bundeswehr and commit to a decade-long investment in the defense sector to enhance national security.


The steps are both obvious and strategically advantageous for the EU, NATO, and Ukraine.

This, essentially, represents the core of our defense and security aspirations.

Admittedly, the analysis is highly positive for us. We've been anticipating something like this since the beginning of the great war – which is quite hard to believe even. And this conclusion comes from a specialized state structure.

Even if this becomes the cornerstone of Germany's, the EU's, and NATO's entire security policy, it still needs validation from national governments and parliaments (with lots of leftists and Russian lobbyists), as well as systemic changes in the economy and social aspects (like conscript training and benefits, etc.)

However, the fact that this is even being discussed in Europe quite officially is a breakthrough in regional geopolitics and collective security strategy.

Obviously, Ukraine should endorse these conclusions and recommendations with all its might, using them as a basis for renewed international policy and relations with allies. This is the only real option for our victory and recovery as a state. But who would do that… 


About the author. Oleksiy Holobutsky, political scientist

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.

Read also:
  • News
2024, Friday
1 March
Victorious news on 737th day of war: destroyed Russian equipment near Synkivka, explosions in Crimea
Putin is too old to build regime 2.0
Ukrainian soldiers target elite Russian assault group in Avdiivka sector
Russian army tries to break through Ukraine's defense 25 times in Novopavlivka sector
France destroys Putin's 'red lines' - analyst of National Institute for Strategic Studies
Ukraine's army shoots down 228 UAVs in February, including 116 Lancets
Netherlands announces new military aid package for Ukraine: what it includes
Navalny's murder might motivate resistance, radicalise protests in Russia — sociologist Eidman
NATO: Putin's threats to use nuclear weapons is psychological intimidation
Russian missiles attacks Donetsk region, injuring civilians, damaging police station, hospital, kindergartens
Ukraine, Netherlands sign security agreement: what does it provide for?
Map of fighting in Marinka sector
Under heavy fire: Ukrainian officer on situation in Marinka sector
Frozen Russian assets won't replace US aid to Ukraine - Treasury Secretary Yellen
Why Scholz is hesitant to transfer Taurus to Ukraine?
Russian troops bomb residential buildings in Zaporizhzhia region, killing civilian man
Measuring temperature in chamber: diplomat on China's special envoy's trip to number of countries
Russia holds significant ammunition advantage, increases artillery shelling in Avdiivka direction
Transnistria: Where there is a trace of Russia, there is war
Russia makes "powerful breakthrough" to Chasiv Yar to open way to 3 more localities - Khortytsia group of troops
British intelligence assesses level and prospects of Russian military industry
Red lines are blurring: military expert Zgurets on possible deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine
Transition to F-16 not swift, but Ukraine making every effort – Air Force
Ukraine's Intelligence attacks Russian Pantsir-S1 air defense system in Belgorod region
Umerov approves action plan to implement cooperation program with NATO for 2024
Putin's message: whom was the dictator addressing?
Russian pilots feel they are in the sights — Ukraine's Air Force Spokesman Ihnat 
OSCE launches "Moscow mechanism" to document Russian war crimes
IL-76 crash: Russia says it's willing to return bodies to Ukraine; Ukraine responds
Britain urges Germany to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine - Bloomberg
Japan extends sanctions against Russian companies and individuals
Does CIA have any bases in Ukraine and what was the purpose of its director's visit? Serhiy Zgurets's column
Polish farmers fail to provide evidence of Ukrainian grain returning from Lithuania to Poland 
Russian media claim attempted UAV attack on defense plant in Nizhny Novgorod region
No one in Europe is going to send troops to Ukraine - Czech Prime Minister
Russia loses 3 aircraft, 36 artillery systems and 920 troops in Ukraine overnight — General Staff
Russia transports its agricultural goods through Belarus to Poland — UP
Ukrainian forces transform Synkivka into graveyard for Russian equipment — Kupyansk Military Administration
2024, Thursday
29 February
Putin's messages of war: Vitaliy Portnikov's column
Victorious news on 736th day of war: Ukrainian forces down 3 Russian aircraft, target Russian soldiers in Bakhmut sector
Russia attacks 22 times in Avdiivka, Novopavlivka directions in one day — General Staff
More news