Espreso. Global
OPINION

Beijing disrupting peace prospects in Russian-Ukrainian War, not Peace Summit

3 June, 2024 Monday
15:48

During a press conference on sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue Security Summit in Singapore, Zelenskyy openly accused the leadership of China of trying to disrupt the Peace Summit in Switzerland 

client/title.list_title

Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized that participation in the summit and assistance to Ukraine and the civilized world in ending the war were not mandatory. However, he pointed out that actions aimed at disrupting the Peace Summit, such as weakening the level of leaders' presence, preventing some leaders from attending, and exerting pressure on them, certainly did not bring peace any closer. In his view, this behavior not only supported Russia but also effectively supported the war, as it suggested that those who did not support the Peace Summit found the current situation acceptable.

It is worth recalling that China launched a real diplomatic offensive to weaken the influence of the Peace Summit and even disrupt the presence of many countries of the Global South a few weeks ago. By and large, the diplomatic tour of Chinese Foreign Minister Li Hui, his virtual meetings with national security advisors and other officials from many countries of the Global South, and the unveiling by the Chinese Foreign Ministry of its own vision of ending the war, which was agreed upon by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Putin, and Brazilian President Lula da Silva, have already become the first steps towards disrupting the Peace Summit and reducing the level of representation at it.

China's official refusal to send any delegation to the summit because its organizers did not fulfill China's main condition, which was the presence of a high-ranking Russian representative, apparently Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in Switzerland, can also be seen as a demonstration of not only unwillingness to participate in the Peace Summit, but also to influence the leaders of the Global South to not attend the meeting. But it's worth noting that Beijing is not just making public its own vision, as the Ukrainian president said, and not just emphasizing that its delegation will not be present in Switzerland. It is also recommending that other countries that value good relations with China also not participate in the Peace Summit and instead prepare an alternative international conference, which China obviously sees as organized either by its own country or by the BRICS member states close to China.

So we can clearly say that China has indeed decided to hold a real diplomatic duel with Ukraine. Moreover, China's leadership realizes that its weight in the world, and in the Global South in particular, is much more important and convincing than that of  Russia. By and large, Russia cannot put pressure on the countries of the Global South and threaten them with anything, because it is interested in those countries buying its oil. It is in its relations with the countries of the Global South that Russia sees a chance to reduce the effect of Western sanctions and, at the same time, to continue steps to further militarize the Russian economy and continue the war with Ukraine, which has been and remains the main political objective of the Russian leader.

But China is an important investor in the Global South. And of course, the leaders of countries hoping for good economic relations with China will now think twice before deciding whether to attend the summit in Switzerland themselves or send a representative delegation.

In addition, the attempt to disrupt the summit in Switzerland is precisely the publication of an alternative vision of peace in Ukraine, which is now being actively promoted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, offering leaders of the Global South to solidarize with the Chinese approach. And it must be said that there are already results here, because we know that this version of the peace plan is no longer even called the Chinese peace plan, but the Chinese-Brazilian peace plan.

To be honest, I think that in the coming days or weeks we will see some more important countries among the allies of China and Russia supporting this vision. Because there is a serious divergence here between the understanding of a just peace that Ukraine advocates, at least as an approach to negotiations. A peace that is associated with respect for international law, with the aggressor's responsibility for the war that Russia has waged against Ukraine, and so on, and the Chinese vision, which is primarily associated with freezing the Russian-Ukrainian war. If we take a closer look at the proposals put forward by the Chinese leadership today, we will see that Ukraine had to agree to suspend this war without any real guarantees for its own security, and this is already a rather serious blow to Ukrainian national interests; that there is no question of any negotiations on restoring Ukraine's territorial integrity in this regard.

China, on the other hand, is trying to promote as the most important points what it is concerned about, primarily the preservation of financial institutions and international trade routes, and the prevention of nuclear danger. And here we can say that the Ukrainian and Chinese positions coincide only in the point related to the use of nuclear weapons. This is, of course, an important part of the Chinese position, which may somehow influence Putin's perception of his ability to use these weapons in a war with Ukraine. However, if Putin sees that he can continue this war indefinitely and that China is willing to help him both economically and in rebuilding the Russian military-industrial complex, then the question arises: why would Putin use nuclear weapons at all when instead of nuclear weapons he can cooperate with time - with time that will allow him to hope for a continuation of the war of attrition?

That is why Beijing today is not disrupting the Peace Summit, but the prospect that this peace will be achieved in the Russian-Ukrainian war, at least in the coming years.

Source

About the author. Vitaliy Portnykov, journalist, winner of the Shevchenko National Prize of Ukraine

The editors do not always share the opinions expressed by the blog authors.

Tags:
Read also:
  • News
2024, Monday
24 June
17:18
Germany declares it will not deport unemployed Ukrainian refugees
16:57
Russian forces strike Pokrovsk with Iskander missiles: 4 civilians killed, 34 injured
16:30
North Macedonia's new government vows support for Ukraine
16:10
Russian forces use chemical munitions against Ukrainian army 715 times in May
15:51
Ukraine may receive €2.5 billion in profits from Russian assets - EU's Borrell
15:28
Ukraine assesses risk of Belarusian army's sudden inspection near border
15:12
EU announces new 14th package of sanctions against 116 Russian individuals and entities
14:55
German Federal Council President Schwesig arrives in Kyiv
14:40
OPINION
ECtHR begins delivering judgments in cases against Russia
14:17
Exclusive
Exposions in Sevastopol is another reminder that Crimea is Ukraine - Ukrainian MP
13:59
Why Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure won’t help it win war
13:31
Ukraine's General Staff reports 62 firefights, active Russian attacks in Siversk and Pokrovsk sectors
13:10
Attacks on Russian refineries won't shift war's tide, but will have military impact – Ukraine's spy chief
12:48
Exclusive
Russian troops conduct small group assaults in Horlivka direction - Ukrainian serviceman Iyevlyev
12:30
OPINION
Russia will win only if Ukrainians give it this victory
12:10
Exclusive
Pokrovsk direction is top priority for Russian army - military expert Zgurets
11:58
Updated
Russian army attacks Odesa with missiles, causing casualties
11:45
US, South Korea, and Japan condemn North Korea's military ties with Russia, urge return to negotiations
11:05
Ukraine to receive first batch of ammunition under Czech initiative by late June
10:44
Russia relocates Tu-95MS bombers at Engels airfield every five hours fearing Ukraine’s attacks
10:25
Ukrainian forces deny Russia seizing Novooleksandrivka in Pokrovsk direction
10:03
Russia places military facilities near civilian areas in Crimea: ISW explains why
09:35
Russia loses 12 tanks, 51 artillery systems and 1,300 soldiers in one day of war in Ukraine
2024, Sunday
23 June
21:23
Interview
Main task of next NATO Secretary General is to expand Alliance - Polish politician
20:59
India imports record amount of oil from Russia in May – media
20:40
Russia responds to Ukrainian strike on Crimea
19:59
Russian troops intensify advances in Kupyansk and Pokrovsk directions - Ukraine's General Staff
19:46
US support allows Ukraine to strike into Russian territory, disrupting Kharkiv offensive - media
18:59
Exclusive
Ukrainian general assesses chance of Defense Forces' counteroffensive
18:25
Updated
Ukrainian forces strike Russian motorized rifle regiment’s command post: video
17:35
South Korea to lift any restrictions on aid to Ukraine if Russia provides precision weapons to North Korea
16:31
Explosions rock Sevastopol: Russia claims downing 4 ATACMS missiles, 2 dead
15:50
Vietnam calls U.S. strategic partner after Putin's visit
15:05
Work or go home: German opposition urges deportation for unemployed Ukrainian refugees
14:30
Intensification of Russian attacks in Donetsk region may indicate start of summer offensive – ISW
14:03
Partisans in Russia burn relay box on Rostov-on-Don to Mariupol railway
13:32
OPINION
EU membership negotiations: Choice between two evils
12:50
Ukraine’s intelligence reports increase in Russian servicemen surrendering through I Want to Live Project
12:21
Russian troops attack Kyiv region with missiles, injuring civilians
11:50
Exclusive
Why Russia uses Sea of Azov to launch Kalibr missiles – military insight
More news