Espreso. Global

Barracuda as alternative or compliment to Tomahawks for Ukraine: capabilities, limits, launch options

2 October, 2025 Thursday
14:58

Alongside the well‑known Tomahawk, the American company Anduril’s Barracuda family is being discussed as a possible long‑range option for Ukraine. The system has promise — but also two critical drawbacks that limit its utility

client/title.list_title

Defense Express reported the information.

Among the Barracuda family, three variants are currently described: Barracuda‑100, Barracuda‑250 and Barracuda‑500. They differ substantially in size and range: the Barracuda‑100 is listed with roughly 110 km (ground launch) and 150 km (air launch), the Barracuda‑250 with about 280 km and 370 km, while the Barracuda‑500 is claimed to exceed 900 km when air‑launched.

However, Defense Express says the small warhead is an important limitation. The Barracuda‑100 and ‑250 carry about 16 kg of explosives, and the Barracuda‑500 about 45 kg. In effect, only the Barracuda‑500 has a warhead that could be considered meaningful for strikes in the Russian theater; the smaller versions are too lightly armed for many target sets.

Launch options have been evolving. Until recently, the Barracuda‑500 was intended only for air launch from platforms such as fighter jets or via pallet systems like Rapid Dragon from transport aircraft. 

But Anduril has just demonstrated a ground‑launch variant; published test footage shows successful firings, although range appears to fall to around 600–700 km (no official ground‑launch figures were released).

On guidance, Defense Express says the Barracuda family likely relies on a typical mix of inertial navigation, satellite navigation and terrain‑contour matching — essentially the same “intelligence data” Ukraine would need to strike targets inside Russia.

Availability is another major question. Barracudas are not yet in mass production and are supplied only on an initiative basis by Anduril to customers, including the U.S. government. Anduril publicly projects scalable manufacturing, but the company plans to reach multi‑thousand annual production rates only by late 2026, and then only if orders materialize. Even a 3,000‑per‑year pace would translate to roughly 250 missiles a month — a modest flow for a high‑intensity campaign.

Taken together, Defense Express says the two principal drawbacks are clear: limited stocks (production ramp‑up constraints) and relatively small warheads (which reduce effectiveness against certain targets). Still, Defense Express concludes, Ukraine cannot afford to rule out Barracuda or similar systems — particularly because Tomahawks themselves are produced in limited numbers and come at very high cost. For example, the Dutch purchase of 175 Tomahawks carried a DSCA‑listed maximum price that equates to roughly $12.5 million per missile — making wide procurement challenging.

Defense Express concludes Barracuda could complement scarce Tomahawks, but only the Barracuda‑500 is likely to be useful for strikes against the Russian mainland, and even it faces production and warhead‑effectiveness constraints that limit how much it can substitute for classic cruise missiles.

Tags:
Read also: