Russia is experiencing information shocks due to events in Belgorod region

Russia's information space reacted to the events in the Belgorod region on May 22 with panic, factionalism and inconsistency, which it usually demonstrates when it experiences significant information shocks

This is stated in a new report by the Institute for the Study of War.

For example, some pro-war bloggers have focused on the fact that pro-Ukrainian Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK) and Freedom of Russia Legion (LSR) consist mostly of Russians, calling them traitors to Russia and falsely accusing them of working for the GUR.

"Several milbloggers additionally speculated that the attack was a purposeful information operation intended to distract from the recent Russian capture of Bakhmut and to instill panic in the Russian information space in advance of a potential Ukrainian counteroffensive," the experts say.

Former Russian officer and ultranationalist Igor Girkin said he had long warned that such cross-border raids could be part of a broader Ukrainian counteroffensive strategy.

Instead, Wagner PMC financier Yevgeny Prigozhin used the incident to accuse the Russian government and its bureaucratic inaction of facilitating the attack. He criticized the Russian Defense Ministry for failing to strengthen borders and protect Russia.

The first line of Russian defensive fortifications spotted was, in particular, 2 km from Hora Podil, and the assumption that the RDK forces managed to break through the defensive line emphasizes the weakness of such fortifications, at least when they are not fully staffed with well-trained and well-equipped soldiers.

Analysts note that since most Russian pro-war bloggers responded with relatively different concerns, anxieties and anger, and the information space did not coalesce around one coherent reaction to the event, this indicates that the events took Russian commentators by surprise.